Self-Measured Blood Pressure–Guided Pharmacotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of United States-Based Telemedicine Trials

Author:

Acharya Sameer12ORCID,Neupane Gagan3ORCID,Seals Austin,KC Madhav4,Giustini Dean5ORCID,Sharma Sharan6,Taylor Yhenneko J.7ORCID,Palakshappa Deepak2ORCID,Williamson Jeff D.2,Moore Justin B.8ORCID,Bosworth Hayden B.9ORCID,Pokharel Yashashwi27ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Internal Medicine, Cayuga Medical Center, Ithaca, NY (S.A.).

2. Department of Internal Medicine, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, NC (A.S., D.P., J.D.W., Y.P.).

3. Department of Internal Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton (G.N.).

4. School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT (M.K.).

5. The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada (D.G.).

6. SCL Health Heart and Vascular: Sisters of Charity of Leavenworth Health Heart and Vascular Institute, Brighton, CO (S.S.).

7. Center for Health System Sciences, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC (Y.J.T., Y.P.).

8. Department of Implementation Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (J.B.M.).

9. Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC (H.B.B.).

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal approach to implementing telemedicine hypertension management in the United States is unknown. METHODS: We examined telemedicine hypertension management versus the effect of usual clinic-based care on blood pressure (BP) and patient/clinician-related heterogeneity in a systematic review/meta-analysis. We searched United States-based randomized trials from Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Compendex, Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus, and 2 trial registries. We used trial-level differences in BP and its control rate at ≥6 months using random-effects models. We examined heterogeneity in univariable metaregression and in prespecified subgroups (clinicians leading pharmacotherapy [physician/nonphysician], self-management support [pharmacist/nurse], White versus non-White patient predominant trials [>50% patients/trial], diabetes predominant trials [≥25% patients/trial], and White patient predominant but not diabetes predominant trials versus both non-White and diabetes patient predominant trials]. RESULTS: Thirteen, 11, and 7 trials were eligible for systolic and diastolic BP difference and BP control, respectively. Differences in systolic and diastolic BP and BP control rate were −7.3 mm Hg (95% CI, −9.4 to −5.2), −2.7 mm Hg (−4.0 to −1.5), and 10.1% (0.4%–19.9%), respectively, favoring telemedicine. Greater BP reduction occurred in trials where nonphysicians led pharmacotherapy, pharmacists provided self-management support, White patient predominant trials, and White patient predominant but not diabetes predominant trials, with no difference by diabetes predominant trials. CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine hypertension management is more effective than clinic-based care in the United States, particularly when nonphysicians lead pharmacotherapy and pharmacists provide self-management support. Non-White patient predominant trials achieved less BP reduction. Equity-conscious, locally informed adaptation of telemedicine interventions is needed before wider implementation.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3