Efficacy and Safety of Quarter-Dose Blood Pressure–Lowering Agents

Author:

Bennett Alexander1,Chow Clara K.1,Chou Michael1,Dehbi Hakim-Moulay1,Webster Ruth1,Salam Abdul1,Patel Anushka1,Neal Bruce1,Peiris David1,Thakkar Jay1,Chalmers John1,Nelson Mark1,Reid Christopher1,Hillis Graham S.1,Woodward Mark1,Hilmer Sarah1,Usherwood Tim1,Thom Simon1,Rodgers Anthony1

Affiliation:

1. From the George Institute for Global Health (A.B., C.K.C., R.W., A.S., A.P., B.N., D.P., J.T., J.C., M.W., A.R.) and Charles Perkins Centre (C.K.C., B.N.), University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (C.K.C., J.T.); The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (S.H., T.U., A.R.); The University of Western Australia, Perth (G.S.H.); Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD (M.C.); Cancer Research UK and UCL...

Abstract

There is a critical need for blood pressure–lowering strategies that have greater efficacy and minimal side effects. Low-dose combinations hold promise in this regard, but there are few data on very-low-dose therapy. We, therefore, conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with at least one quarter-dose and one placebo and standard-dose monotherapy arm. A search was conducted of Medline, Embase, Cochrane Registry, Food and Drug Administration, and European Medicinal Agency websites. Data on blood pressure and adverse events were pooled using a fixed-effect model, and bias was assessed using Cochrane risk of bias. The review included 42 trials involving 20 284 participants. Thirty-six comparisons evaluated quarter-dose with placebo and indicated a blood pressure reduction of −4.7/−2.4 mm Hg ( P <0.001). Six comparisons were of dual quarter-dose therapy versus placebo, observing a −6.7/ −4.4 mm Hg ( P <0.001) blood pressure reduction. There were no trials of triple quarter-dose combination versus placebo, but one quadruple quarter-dose study observed a blood pressure reduction of −22.4/−13.1 mm Hg versus placebo ( P <0.001). Compared with standard-dose monotherapy, the blood pressure differences achieved by single (37 comparisons), dual (7 comparisons), and quadruple (1 trial) quarter-dose combinations were +3.7/+2.6 ( P <0.001), +1.3/−0.3 (NS), and −13.1/−7.9 ( P <0.001) mm Hg, respectively. In terms of adverse events, single and dual quarter-dose therapy was not significantly different from placebo and had significantly fewer adverse events compared with standard-dose monotherapy. Quarter-dose combinations could provide improvements in efficacy and tolerability of blood pressure–lowering therapy.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Internal Medicine

Cited by 54 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3