Clinic Versus Daytime Ambulatory Blood Pressure Difference in Hypertensive Patients

Author:

Banegas José R.1,Ruilope Luis M.1,de la Sierra Alejandro1,Vinyoles Ernest1,Gorostidi Manuel1,de la Cruz Juan J.1,Segura Julián1,Oliveras Anna1,Martell Nieves1,García-Puig Juan1,Williams Bryan1

Affiliation:

1. From the Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid/IdiPAZ and CIBER in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Spain (J.R.B., L.M.R., J.J.d.l.C.); Instituto de Investigación Hospital Doce de Octubre, Madrid, Spain (L.M.R.); Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Mutua Terrassa, University of Barcelona, Spain (A.d.l.S.); La Mina Primary Care Center, Department of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Spain (E.V.); Nephrology Service, Department of Medicine...

Abstract

Clinic blood pressure (BP) is usually higher than daytime ambulatory BP in hypertensive patients, but some recent studies have challenged this view, suggesting that this relationship is strongly influenced by age. We used the Spanish ambulatory BP monitoring cohort to examine differences between clinic and daytime BP by age among 104 639 adult hypertensive patients (office systolic/diastolic BP ≥140/90 mm Hg or treated) in usual primary-care practice, across the wide age spectrum. To assess the impact of age, cardiovascular variables, and clinic BP on the clinic–daytime BP differences, we built multivariable regression models of the average BP differences, white-coat hypertension (high clinic BP and normal daytime BP), and masked hypertension (normal clinic BP and high daytime BP). In most patients, mean clinic BP values were higher than daytime BP at all ages. Some 36.7% of patients had white-coat hypertension (amounting to 50% at clinic systolic BP of 140–159 mm Hg) and 3.9% had masked hypertension (amounting to 18% at clinic systolic BP of 130–139 mm Hg). Age explained 0.1% to 1.7% of the variance of quantitative or categorical BP differences ( P <0.001). Cardiovascular variables explained an additional 1.6% to 3.4% of the variance ( P <0.001). Finally, clinic BP generally explained ≥20% more of the variance ( P <0.01). In this large study in usual clinical practice, clinic BP misclassified hypertension status in >40% of patients. This misclassification was not importantly influenced by age but was more evident in patients with borderline/grade 1 hypertension. These findings reinforce the importance of ambulatory BP monitoring for defining BP status in routine clinical practice.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Internal Medicine

Cited by 29 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3