Carotid Pressure Is a Better Predictor of Coronary Artery Disease Severity Than Brachial Pressure

Author:

Waddell Tamara K.1,Dart Anthony M.1,Medley Tanya L.1,Cameron James D.1,Kingwell Bronwyn A.1

Affiliation:

1. From the Alfred and Baker Medical Unit, Baker Medical Research Institute (T.K.W., A.M.D., T.L.M., B.A.K.), Prahran, and Department of Electronic Engineering, La Trobe University (J.D.C.), Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.

Abstract

The mechanisms relating pulse pressure to cardiovascular outcome may include surrogacy for coronary disease severity. Although pulse pressure is typically measured at the brachial artery, central pulse pressure and its principal determinant, large-artery stiffness, may relate more closely to disease severity. This study aimed to determine the relationships between large-artery stiffness and carotid and brachial blood pressures and coronary artery disease severity. One hundred fourteen male patients with coronary artery disease (age 60±8 years, mean±SD) and 57 age-matched healthy male controls (age 59±9 years) were recruited. Patients were classified into 2 groups based on the magnitude of their maximum coronary stenosis: moderate (50% to 89%) and severe (≥90%). Large-artery stiffness was assessed as systemic arterial compliance and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity. Mean pressure was not different between the 3 groups. Systemic compliance and carotid pulse pressure were significantly different between all 3 groups, with compliance lowest and pressure highest in the severe group ( P <0.05). Pulse wave velocity was higher in patients with severe stenosis than in those with moderate stenosis ( P <0.01) and those in the control group ( P <0.001). Brachial pulse pressure was higher in patients than in controls ( P <0.05), but there was no difference between the 2 disease groups. In separate multivariate analyses, carotid pressures and systemic arterial compliance were determinants of coronary artery disease severity, independent of age, smoking status, body mass index, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, cholesterol levels (total, LDL, and HDL), triglycerides, and β-antagonist and lipid-lowering therapy ( P <0.001), whereas brachial pressures and pulse wave velocity were not. In conclusion, central blood pressures and systemic arterial compliance are more sensitive markers of coronary artery disease severity than brachial pressures.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Internal Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3