Relations Between Aortic Stiffness and Left Ventricular Mechanical Function in the Community

Author:

Bell Vanessa1,McCabe Elizabeth L.2,Larson Martin G.23,Rong Jian3,Merz Allison A.4,Osypiuk Ewa3,Lehman Birgitta T.3,Stantchev Plamen3,Aragam Jayashri5,Benjamin Emelia J.637,Hamburg Naomi M.78,Vasan Ramachandran S.637,Mitchell Gary F.1,Cheng Susan34

Affiliation:

1. Cardiovascular Engineering, Inc., Norwood, MA

2. Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA

3. Framingham Heart Study, Framingham, MA

4. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA

5. Veterans Administration Hospital, West Roxbury, MA

6. Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA

7. Preventive Medicine and Cardiology Sections, Whitaker Cardiovascular Institute, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA

8. Evans Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA

Abstract

Background Aortic stiffness impairs optimal ventricular–vascular coupling and left ventricular systolic function, particularly in the long axis. Left ventricular global longitudinal strain ( GLS ) has recently emerged as a sensitive measure of early cardiac dysfunction. In this study, we investigated the relation between aortic stiffness and GLS in a large community‐based sample. Methods and Results In 2495 participants (age 39–90 years, 57% women) of the Framingham Offspring and Omni cohorts, free of cardiovascular disease, we performed tonometry to measure arterial hemodynamics and echocardiography to assess cardiac function. Aortic stiffness was evaluated as carotid–femoral pulse wave velocity and as characteristic impedance, and GLS was calculated using speckle tracking–based measurements. In multivariable analyses adjusting for age, sex, height, systolic blood pressure, augmentation index, left ventricular structure, and additional cardiovascular risk factors, increased carotid–femoral pulse wave velocity (B± SE : 0.122±0.030% strain per SD , P <0.0001) and characteristic impedance (0.090±0.029, P =0.002) were both associated with worse GLS . We observed effect modification by sex on the relation between characteristic impedance and GLS ( P =0.004); in sex‐stratified multivariable analyses, the relation between greater characteristic impedance and worse GLS persisted in women (0.145±0.039, P =0.0003) but not in men ( P =0.73). Conclusions Multiple measures of increased aortic stiffness were cross‐sectionally associated with worse GLS after adjusting for hemodynamic variables. Parallel reductions in left ventricular long axis shortening and proximal aortic longitudinal strain in individuals with a stiffened proximal aorta, from direct mechanical ventricular‐vascular coupling, offers an alternative explanation for the observed relations.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3