First Postpacing Interval Variability During Right Ventricular Stimulation

Author:

Arenal Angel1,Almendral Jesus1,Villacastin Julian1,Morris Raimundo1,Castellanos Eduardo1,Delcan Juan Luis1

Affiliation:

1. From the Department of Cardiology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Madrid, Spain.

Abstract

Background —Failure to differentiate supraventricular from ventricular arrhythmias is the most frequent cause of inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapies. Although a sudden-onset criterion is available to differentiate sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardias (SMVTs) and sinus tachycardias (STs), SMVTs arising during ST and SMVTs gradually accelerating above the cutoff rate can remain undetected. Regular paroxysmal atrial tachycardias (ATs) also can be undetected by onset and stability algorithms. We hypothesized that the first postpacing interval (FPPI) variability after overdrive right ventricular pacing may differentiate SMVTs from STs and ATs. Methods and Results —FPPI variability was measured in 23 SMVTs (cycle length [CL] 366±50 ms [VT group]), 27 supraventricular tachycardias, 15 episodes of induced or simulated ATs (CL 376±29 ms [AT group]), and 12 exercise-related STs (CL 381±24 [ST group]). Sequences of trains of 5, 10, and 15 beats were delivered with a CL 40 ms shorter than the tachycardia CL. An FPPI absolute mean difference between consecutive trains of 5 and 10 beats (ΔFPPI) ≤25 ms identified all VTs (mean difference 5±7 ms). In the AT group, the ΔFPPI was >25 ms in all sequences (mean difference 129±60 ms, P <0.01). In the ST group, the ΔFPPI was >50 ms in all STs (mean difference 118±47 ms, P <0.01). Conclusions —FPPI variability may differentiate SMVT from AT and ST. This criterion is potentially useful in implantable devices that use a single ventricular lead.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3