Accuracy of angiographic determination of left main coronary arterial narrowing. Angiographic--histologic correlative analysis in 28 patients.

Author:

Isner J M,Kishel J,Kent K M,Ronan J A,Ross A M,Roberts W C

Abstract

To evaluate the accuracy of coronary angiography in identifying severe narrowing of the left main coronary artery (LMCA), the degree of narrowing observed by angiography was compared to that observed at necropsy in 28 patients with symptomatic coronary heart disease in whom angiography had been performed within 40 days of death. The angiograms were evaluated independently by three experienced angiographers. In 20 of the 28 patients (71%), the degree of narrowing of the LMCA was either underestimated (13 patients) or overestimated (10 patients) by two or three of three angiographers; of 84 angiographic judgments made by the three angiographers in the 28 patients, 54 (64%) were underestimates (33 judgments, 39%) or overestimates (21 judgments, 25%) of the degree of LMCA narrowing. Of 12 LMCAs narrowed 76-100% in cross-sectional area at necropsy, six were underestimated at preoperative angiography by two or three of three angiographers; of 12 LMCAs narrowed 51-75% in cross-sectional area at necropsy, all 12 were either under- or overestimated angiographically by two or three of three angiographers; of four LMCAs narrowed 26-50% in cross-section at necropsy, two were overestimated by two of three angiographers. Thus, angiographic determination of degrees of narrowing of the LMCA during life is subject to considerable error. The angiographic errors appear to have resulted primarily from the presence of atherosclerotic plaque in the LMCA and an insufficient number of angiographic projections.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 255 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3