Quantitative difference in "critical" stenosis between right and left coronary artery in man.

Author:

Rafflenbeul W,Urthaler F,Lichtlen P,James T N

Abstract

Coronary artery stenoses that limit blood flow below demand are considered critical. In this comparative study we investigated whether the same degree of stenosis in either the proximal third of the right coronary artery (RCA) or the proximal third of the left anterior descending artery (LAD) causes critical flow reduction. Lesions were quantified from 35-mm cinefilms in multiple projections using a vernier caliper. These morphometric measurements were correlated with various manifestations of critical flow reduction, such as angina pectoris, development of collateral vessels and segmental wall motion abnormalities. In 13 patients with anginal pain and isolated RCA stenosis, the mean degree of obstruction was 63% area stenosis, which was significantly lower (p < 0.05) than that measured in 17 symptomatic patients who had isolated obstructions of the LAD (77% area stenosis). In patients with an identical degree of obstruction (78%) in either the LAD or RCA, collateral vessels were angiographically demonstrable in 53% of the RCA stenoses but in only 29% of the LAD stenoses. Furthermore, when the stenoses were less than 63% in the RCA and LAD, regional wall motion abnormalities were more frequently (p < 0.05) associated with RCA than with LAD stenoses. These observations indicate that a significantly smaller percent area of stenosis is critical in the RCA than in the LAD.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Reference60 articles.

1. Hemodynamic effects of arterial stenosis;May AG;Surgery,1963

2. Factors Affecting Flow Through a Stenosed Vessel

3. Critical Arterial Stenosis

4. Feldman RL Nichols WW Pepine CJ Conetta DA Conti CR: Observations upon the concept of "critical" coronary stenosis. (abstr) Am J Cardiol 41: 970 1978

Cited by 38 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3