Relative lack of coronary blood flow during closed-chest resuscitation in dogs.

Author:

Ditchey R V,Winkler J V,Rhodes C A

Abstract

Recent studies have shown that blood flow during closed-chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) results primarily from generalized changes in intrathoracic pressure rather than direct compression of the heart. Since ascending aortic and right atrial pressures rise and fall synchronously and to comparable levels during CPR, we hypothesized that the absence of a pressure difference across the coronary vascular bed during CPR precludes coronary blood flow. To test this hypothesis, we compared high-fidelity ascending aortic and right atrial pressures and carotid and coronary blood flow (electromagnetic flowmeters) during closed-chest CPR in 12 fibrillating dogs. Chest compression force was increased from 40 to 140 pounds in 20-pound increments using a pneumatic chest compression device. Although ascending aortic and right atrial pressures were always similar, high-compression-force CPR produced small mean pressure differences across the coronary vascular bed (5.6 +/- 0.8 mm Hg [+/- SEM] at 140 pounds). These pressure differences were accompanied by low levels of coronary blood flow. However, coronary flow was less than 1% control (prearrest) values whenever chest compression force was less than 100 pounds, and carotid flow exceeded coronary flow under all conditions (carotid and coronary flows at 140 pounds = 26.2 +/- 6.4% and 4.3 +/- 2.0% of prearrest values, respectively, p less than 0.01). We conclude that generalized changes in intrathoracic vascular pressures during closed-chest CPR promote carotid but not coronary blood flow. High-compression-force CPR produces small pressure differences across the coronary vascular bed, allowing low levels of coronary flow. However, even high-compression-force CPR is over six times more effective in maintaining carotid flow than coronary flow.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 214 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3