Sex Differences in Modifiable Risk Factors and Severity of Coronary Artery Disease

Author:

Manfrini Olivia1ORCID,Yoon Jinsung2ORCID,van der Schaar Mihaela3ORCID,Kedev Sasko4ORCID,Vavlukis Marija4ORCID,Stankovic Goran56ORCID,Scarpone Marialuisa1,Miličić Davor7,Vasiljevic Zorana6,Badimon Lina8ORCID,Cenko Edina1ORCID,Bugiardini Raffaele1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine University of Bologna Bologna Italy

2. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of California Los Angeles CA

3. Cambridge Centre for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics and Department of Population Health University of Cambridge Cambridge United Kingdom

4. University Clinic of Cardiology Medical Faculty University "Ss. Cyril and Methodius" Skopje Macedonia

5. Clinic of Cardiology University Clinical Centre of Serbia Belgrade Serbia

6. Medical Faculty University of Belgrade Serbia

7. Department for Cardiovascular Diseases University Hospital Center Zagreb University of Zagreb Croatia

8. Cardiovascular Research Program ICCC, IR‐IIBSant Pau, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, CiberCV‐Institute Carlos III Barcelona Spain

Abstract

Background It is still unknown whether traditional risk factors may have a sex‐specific impact on coronary artery disease (CAD) burden. Methods and Results We identified 14 793 patients who underwent coronary angiography for acute coronary syndromes in the ISACS‐TC (International Survey of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Transitional Countries; Clini​calTr​ials.gov , NCT01218776) registry from 2010 to 2019. The main outcome measure was the association between traditional risk factors and severity of CAD and its relationship with 30‐day mortality. Relative risk (RR) ratios and 95% CIs were calculated from the ratio of the absolute risks of women versus men using inverse probability of weighting. Estimates were compared by test of interaction on the log scale. Severity of CAD was categorized as obstructive (≥50% stenosis) versus nonobstructive CAD. The RR ratio for obstructive CAD in women versus men among people without diabetes mellitus was 0.49 (95% CI, 0.41–0.60) and among those with diabetes mellitus was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.62–1.29), with an interaction by diabetes mellitus status of P =0.002. Exposure to smoking shifted the RR ratios from 0.50 (95% CI, 0.41–0.61) in nonsmokers to 0.75 (95% CI, 0.54–1.03) in current smokers, with an interaction by smoking status of P =0.018. There were no significant sex‐related interactions with hypercholesterolemia and hypertension. Women with obstructive CAD had higher 30‐day mortality rates than men (RR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.48–2.07). No sex differences in mortality were observed in patients with nonobstructive CAD. Conclusions Obstructive CAD in women signifies a higher risk for mortality compared with men. Current smoking and diabetes mellitus disproportionally increase the risk of obstructive CAD in women. Achieving the goal of improving cardiovascular health in women still requires intensive efforts toward further implementation of lifestyle and treatment interventions. Registration URL: https://www.clini​caltr​ials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT01218776.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3