Affiliation:
1. Department of Population Health Sciences Bristol Medical School University of Bristol UK
2. Division of Population Medicine School of MedicineCardiff University UK
3. MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit University of BristolOakfield House Bristol UK
4. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics Imperial College London London UK
5. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics Section Institute of Medical and Biomedical Education and Institute for Infection and Immunity St George’sUniversity of London UK
6. NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at the University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation TrustUniversity of Bristol UK
7. School of Psychological Science University of Bristol UK
8. Centre for Academic Mental HealthPopulation Health SciencesBristol Medical SchoolUniversity of Bristol UK
Abstract
Background
Education is inversely associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD). Several mediators of this have been established; however, a proportion of the protective effect remains unaccounted for. Mental health is a proposed mediator, but current evidence is mixed and subject to bias from confounding factors and reverse causation. Mendelian randomization is an instrumental variable technique that uses genetic proxies for exposures and mediators to reduce such bias.
Methods and Results
We performed logistic regression and 2‐step Mendelian randomization analyses using UK Biobank data and genetic summary statistics to investigate whether educational attainment affects risk of mental health disorders. We then performed mediation analyses to explore whether mental health disorders mediate the association between educational attainment and cardiovascular risk. Higher levels of educational attainment were associated with reduced depression, anxiety, and CVD in observational analyses (odds ratio [OR], 0.79 [95% CI, 0.77–0.81], 0.76 [95% CI, 0.73–0.79], and 0.75 [95% CI, 0.74–0.76], respectively), and Mendelian randomization analyses provided evidence of causality (OR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.67–0.77], 0.50 [95% CI, 0.42–0.59], and 0.62 [95% CI, 0.58–0.66], respectively). Both anxiety and depression were associated with CVD in observational analyses (OR, 1.63 [95% CI, 1.49–1.79] and 1.70 [95% CI, 1.59–1.82], respectively) but only depression showed evidence of causality in the Mendelian randomization analyses (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.03–1.15). An estimated 2% of the total protective effect of education on CVD was mediated by depression.
Conclusions
Higher levels of educational attainment protect against mental health disorders, and reduced depression accounts for a small proportion of the total protective effect of education on CVD.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Subject
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Reference60 articles.
1. Global atlas on cardiovascular disease prevention and control. WHO. https://www.who.int/cardiovascular_diseases/publications/atlas_cvd/en/. Published January 2020. Accessed January 25 2020.
2. Inequalities in health
. GOV.UK. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/health‐profile‐for‐england‐2018/chapter‐5‐inequalities‐in‐health. Published 2018. Accessed January 25 2020.
3. Education and risk for acute myocardial infarction in 52 high, middle and low-income countries: INTERHEART case-control study
4. Education and coronary heart disease: mendelian randomisation study
5. Do Cardiovascular Risk Factors Explain the Relation between Socioeconomic Status, Risk of All-Cause Mortality, Cardiovascular Mortality, and Acute Myocardial Infarction?