Is Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Better Than Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease? A Nationwide Inpatient Sample Analysis

Author:

Ando Tomo1,Adegbala Oluwole2,Akintoye Emmanuel1,Ashraf Said1,Pahuja Mohit1,Briasoulis Alexandros3,Takagi Hisato4,Grines Cindy L.5,Afonso Luis1,Schreiber Theodore1

Affiliation:

1. Division of Cardiology, Wayne State University/Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI

2. Department of Internal Medicine, Englewood Hospital and Medical Center Seton Hall University‐Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, Englewood, NJ

3. Divison of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA

4. Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Shizuoka Medical Center, Shizuoka, Japan

5. Division of Cardiology, North Shore University Hospital Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Manhasset, NY

Abstract

Background Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ( COPD ) patients are at increased risk of respiratory related complications after cardiac surgery. It is unclear whether transcatheter aortic valve replacement ( TAVR ) or surgical aortic valve replacement ( SAVR ) results in favorable outcomes among COPD patients. Methods and Results Patients were identified from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database from 2011 to 2014. Patients with age ≥60, COPD , and either went transarterial TAVR or SAVR were included in the analysis. A 1:1 propensity‐matched cohort was created to examine the outcomes. A matched pair of 1210 TAVR and 1208 SAVR patients was identified. Respiratory‐related complications such as tracheostomy (0.8% versus 5.8%; odds ratio [ OR ], 0.14; P <0.001), acute respiratory failure (16.4% versus 23.7%; OR , 0.63; P =0.002), reintubation (6.5% versus 10.0%; OR , 0.49; P <0.001), and pneumonia (4.5% versus 10.1%; OR , 0.41; P <0.001) were significantly less frequent with TAVR versus SAVR . Use of noninvasive mechanical ventilation was similar between TAVR and SAVR (4.1% versus 4.8%; OR , 0.84; P =0.41). Non‐respiratory‐related complications, such as in‐hospital mortality (3.3% versus 4.2%; OR , 0.64; P =0.035), bleeding requiring transfusion (9.9% versus 21.7%; OR , 0.38; P <0.001), acute kidney injury (17.7% versus 25.3%; OR , 0.63; P <0.001), and acute myocardial infarction (2.4% versus 8.4%; OR , 0.19; P <0.001), were significantly less frequent with TAVR than SAVR . Cost ($56 099 versus $63 146; P <0.001) and hospital stay (mean, 7.7 versus 13.0 days; P <0.001) were also more favorable with TAVR than SAVR . Conclusions TAVR portended significantly fewer respiratory‐related complications compared with SAVR in COPD patients. TAVR may be a preferable mode of aortic valve replacement in COPD patients.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3