Comparative Cardiovascular Risk of Abatacept and Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis With and Without Diabetes Mellitus: A Multidatabase Cohort Study

Author:

Kang Eun Ha12,Jin Yinzhu1,Brill Gregory1,Lewey Jennifer13,Patorno Elisabetta1,Desai Rishi J.1,Kim Seoyoung C.14

Affiliation:

1. Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

2. Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea

3. Division of Cardiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA

4. Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

Abstract

Background We examined the cardiovascular risk of abatacept compared with tumor necrosis factor ( TNF ) inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis with and without diabetes mellitus ( DM ). Methods and Results We conducted a cohort study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis who newly started abatacept or TNF inhibitors using claims data from Medicare and MarketScan. The primary outcome was a composite cardiovascular end point of myocardial infarction ( MI ), stroke/transient ischemic attack, and coronary revascularization. To account for >60 baseline characteristics, abatacept initiators were 1:1 propensity score ( PS ) matched to TNF initiators in each database. Cox proportional hazards models estimated hazard ratio ( HR ) and 95% confidence interval ( CI ) in the PS ‐matched cohort per database. A fixed‐effects meta‐analysis pooled database‐specific HR s. We included a total of 13 039 PS ‐matched pairs of abatacept and TNF inhibitor initiators (6103 pairs in Medicare and 6936 pairs in MarketScan). A total of 34.7% in Medicare and 19.8% in MarketScan had baseline DM . The HR (95% CI ) for the primary outcome associated with abatacept use versus TNF inhibitor was 0.81 (0.66–0.99) in Medicare and 0.95 (0.74–1.23) in MarketScan, with a pooled HR of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.73–1.01; P =0.3 for heterogeneity). The risk of the primary outcome was lower in abatacept initiators versus TNF inhibitors in the DM subgroup, with a pooled HR of 0.74 (95% CI, 0.57–0.96; P =0.7 for heterogeneity), but not in the non‐ DM subgroup, with a pooled HR of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.77–1.14; P =0.4 for heterogeneity). Conclusions In this large population‐based cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis, abatacept use appeared to be associated with a modestly reduced cardiovascular risk when compared with TNF inhibitor use, particularly in patients with DM.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3