Clinical Outcomes of Deferred Lesions With Angiographically Insignificant Stenosis But Low Fractional Flow Reserve

Author:

Lee Joo Myung1,Koo Bon‐Kwon23,Shin Eun‐Seok4,Nam Chang‐Wook5,Doh Joon‐Hyung6,Hu Xinyang7,Ye Fei8,Chen Shaoliang8,Yang Junqing9,Chen Jiyan9,Tanaka Nobuhiro10,Yokoi Hiroyoshi11,Matsuo Hitoshi12,Takashima Hiroaki13,Shiono Yasutsugu14,Hwang Doyeon2,Park Jonghanne2,Kim Kyung‐Jin2,Akasaka Takashi14,Wang Jianan7

Affiliation:

1. Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

2. Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea

3. Institute on Aging, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea

4. Department of Cardiology, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, South Korea

5. Department of Medicine, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, Daegu, South Korea

6. Department of Medicine, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Goyang, South Korea

7. Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, China

8. Department of Cardiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China

9. Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

10. Department of Cardiology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan

11. Kokura Memorial Hospital, Kitakyuku, Japan

12. Department of Cardiology, Gifu Heart Center, Gifu, Japan

13. Department of Cardiology, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute, Japan

14. Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan

Abstract

Background Data are limited regarding outcomes of deferred lesions in patients with angiographically insignificant stenosis but low fractional flow reserve ( FFR ). We investigated the natural history of angiographically insignificant stenosis with low FFR among patients who underwent routine 3‐vessel FFR measurement. Methods and Results From December 2011 to March 2014, 1136 patients with 3298 vessels underwent routine 3‐vessel FFR measurement (3V FFRFRIENDS study, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT 01621438), and this study analyzed the 2‐year clinical outcomes of 1024 patients with 2124 lesions with angiographically insignificant stenosis (percentage of diameter stenosis <50%), in which revascularization was deferred. All lesions were classified according to FFR values, using a cutoff of 0.80 (high FFR >0.80 versus low FFR ≤0.80). The primary end point was outcome of major adverse cardiovascular events (a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and ischemia‐driven revascularization) at 2 years. Mean angiographic percentage of diameter stenosis and FFR of total lesions were 32.5±10.3% and 0.91±0.08%, respectively. Among the total lesions with angiographically insignificant stenosis, 8.7% showed low FFR (185 lesions). The incidence of lesions with low FFR was 2.5%, 3.8%, 9.0%, and 15.1% in categories of percentage of diameter stenosis <20%, 20% to 30%, 30% to 40%, and 40% to 50%, respectively. At 2‐year follow‐up, the low‐ FFR group showed a significantly higher risk of major adverse cardiovascular events compared with the high FFR group (3.3% versus 1.2%, hazard ratio: 3.371; 95% CI, 1.346–8.442; P =0.009). In multivariable analysis, low FFR was the most powerful independent predictor of future MACE in deferred lesions with angiographically insignificant stenosis (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.617; 95% CI , 1.026–6.679; P =0.044). Conclusions In deferred angiographically insignificant stenosis, lesions with low FFR showed significantly higher event rates than those with high FFR . FFR was an independent predictor of future major adverse cardiovascular events in lesions with angiographically insignificant stenosis. Clinical Trial Registration URL : http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT 01621438.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 17 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3