Predictors of Mortality and Symptomatic Outcome of Patients With Low‐Flow Severe Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Author:

Mangner Norman12,Stachel Georg1,Woitek Felix12,Haussig Stephan2,Schlotter Florian1,Höllriegel Robert2,Adam Jennifer1,Lindner Anna1,Mohr Friedrich W.3,Schuler Gerhard1,Kiefer Philipp4,Leontyev Sergey4,Borger Michael A.4,Thiele Holger1,Holzhey David4,Linke Axel2

Affiliation:

1. Heart Center Leipzig–University Hospital, Leipzig, Germany

2. Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Center Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany

3. Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany

4. Department of Cardiac Surgery, Heart Center Leipzig, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany

Abstract

Background Impaired left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction is a common finding in patients with aortic stenosis and serves as a predictor of morbidity and mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. However, conflicting data on the most accurate measure for LV function exist. We wanted to examine the impact of LV ejection fraction, mean pressure gradient, and stroke volume index on the outcome of patients treated by transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Methods and Results Patients treated by transcatheter aortic valve replacement were primarily separated into normal flow ( NF ; stroke volume index >35 mL/m 2 ) and low flow ( LF ; stroke volume index ≤35 mL/m 2 ). Afterwards, patients were divided into 5 groups: “NF–high gradient,” “NF–low gradient” ( NFLG ), “LF–high gradient,” “paradoxical LF‐LG,” and “classic LF‐LG.” The 3‐year mortality was the primary end point. Of 1600 patients, 789 (49.3%) were diagnosed as having LF , which was characterized by a higher 30‐day ( P =0.041) and 3‐year ( P <0.001) mortality. LF was an independent predictor of all‐cause (hazard ratio, 1.29; 95% confidence interval, 1.03–1.62; P =0.03) and cardiovascular (hazard ratio, 1.37; 95% confidence interval, 1.06–1.77; P =0.016) mortality. Neither mean pressure gradient nor LV ejection fraction was an independent predictor of mortality. Patients with paradoxical LF‐LG (35.0%), classic LF‐LG (35.1%) and LF –high gradient (38.1%) had higher all‐cause mortality at 3 years compared with NF –high gradient (24.8%) and NFLG (27.9%) ( P =0.001). However, surviving patients showed a similar improvement in symptoms regardless of aortic stenosis entity. Conclusions LF is a common finding within the aortic stenosis population and, in contrast to LV ejection fraction or mean pressure gradient, an independent predictor of all‐cause and cardiovascular mortality. Despite increased long‐term mortality, high procedural success and excellent functional improvement support transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with LF severe aortic stenosis.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3