Quantitative Value of Aldosterone‐Renin Ratio for Detection of Aldosterone‐Producing Adenoma: The Aldosterone‐Renin Ratio for Primary Aldosteronism (AQUARR) Study

Author:

Maiolino Giuseppe1,Rossitto Giacomo1,Bisogni Valeria1,Cesari Maurizio1,Seccia Teresa Maria1,Plebani Mario2,Rossi Gian Paolo1,Semplicini Andrea,Ganzaroli Chiara,Pessina Achille Cesare,Mantero Franco,Armanini Decio,Opocher Giuseppe,Mattarello Mee‐Yung,Giacchetti Gilberta,Ronconi Vanessa,Boscaro Marco,Rossi Ermanno,Bernini Giampaolo,Moretti Angelica,Ferri Claudio,Desideri Giovambattista,Andronico Giuseppe,Rizzoni Damiano,Porteri Enzo,Palumbo Gaetana,Letizia Claudio,Caliumi Chiara,Fabris Bruno,Mannelli Massimo,Parenti Gabriele,Maccario Mauro,Ghigo Ezio,Mallamaci Francesca,Zoccali Carmine,Belfiore Anna,

Affiliation:

1. Clinica dell'Ipertensione Arteriosa, and Laboratory Medicine, University of Padua, Italy

2. Department of Medicine – DIMED, University of Padua, Italy

Abstract

Background Current guidelines recommend use of the aldosterone‐renin ratio ( ARR ) for the case detection of primary aldosteronism followed by confirmatory tests to exclude false‐positive results from further diagnostic workup. We investigated the hypothesis that this could be unnecessary in patients with a high ARR value if the quantitative information carried by the ARR is taken into due consideration. Methods and Results We interrogated 2 large data sets of prospectively collected patients studied with the same predefined protocol, which included the captopril challenge test. We used an unambiguous diagnosis of aldosterone‐producing adenoma as reference index. We also assessed whether the post‐captopril ARR and plasma aldosterone concentration fall furnished a diagnostic gain over baseline ARR values. We found that the false‐positive rate fell exponentially, and, conversely, the specificity increased with rising ARR values. At receiver operating characteristics curves and diagnostic odds ratio analysis, the high baseline ARR values implied very high positive likelihood ratio and diagnostic odds ratio values. The baseline and post‐captopril ARR showed similar diagnostic accuracy (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve) in both the exploratory and validation cohorts, indicating lack of diagnostic gain with this confirmatory test (between‐area under the curve difference, 0.005; 95% CI , −0.031 to 0.040; P =0.7 for comparison, and 0.05; 95% CI , −0.061 to 0.064; P =0.051 for comparison, respectively). Conclusions These results indicate that the ARR conveys key quantitative information that, if properly used, can simplify the diagnostic workup, resulting in saving of money and resources. This can offer the chance of diagnosis and ensuing adrenalectomy to a larger number of hypertensive patients, ultimately resulting in better control of blood pressure.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3