Determinants and Outcomes of Vasoplegia Following Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

Author:

Tecson Kristen M.12,Lima Brian3,Lee Andy Y.4,Raza Fayez S.4,Ching Grace2,Lee Cheng‐Han2,Felius Joost5,Baxter Ronald D.6,Still Sasha6,Collier Justin D. G.6,Hall Shelley A.457,Joseph Susan M.457

Affiliation:

1. Baylor Heart and Vascular Institute, Baylor Scott & White Research Institute, Dallas, TX

2. Department of Internal Medicine, Texas A&M University College of Medicine Health Science Center, Dallas, TX

3. Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, North Shore University Hospital, Manhasset, NY

4. Department of Cardiology, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX

5. Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor Scott & White Research Institute, Dallas, TX

6. Department of Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX

7. Center for Advanced Heart and Lung Disease, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX

Abstract

Background Vasoplegia is associated with adverse outcomes following cardiac surgery; however, its impact following left ventricular assist device implantation is largely unexplored. Methods and Results In 252 consecutive patients receiving a left ventricular assist device, vasoplegia was defined as the occurrence of normal cardiac function and index but with the need for intravenous vasopressors within 48 hours following surgery for >24 hours to maintain a mean arterial pressure >70 mm Hg. We further categorized vasoplegia as none ; mild , requiring 1 vasopressor (vasopressin, norepinephrine, or high‐dose epinephrine [>5 μg/min]); or moderate to severe , requiring ≥2 vasopressors. Predictors of vasoplegia severity were determined using a cumulative logit (ordinal logistic regression) model, and 1‐year mortality was evaluated using competing‐risks survival analysis. In total, 67 (26.6%) patients developed mild vasoplegia and 57 (22.6%) developed moderate to severe vasoplegia. The multivariable model for vasoplegia severity utilized preoperative Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) profile, central venous pressure, systolic blood pressure, and intraoperative cardiopulmonary bypass time, which yielded an area under the curve of 0.76. Although no significant differences were noted in stroke or pump thrombosis rates ( P =0.87 and P =0.66, respectively), respiratory failure and major bleeding increased with vasoplegia severity ( P <0.01). Those with moderate to severe vasoplegia had a significantly higher risk of mortality than those without vasoplegia (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.08–4.18; P =0.03). Conclusions Vasoplegia is predictive of unfavorable outcomes, including mortality. Risk factors for future research include preoperative INTERMACS profile, central venous pressure, systolic blood pressure, and intraoperative cardiopulmonary bypass time.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3