Impact of Cardiac Arrest Centers on the Survival of Patients With Nontraumatic Out‐of‐Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Author:

Yeo Jun Wei1ORCID,Ng Zi Hui Celeste1,Goh Amelia Xin Chun1ORCID,Gao Jocelyn Fangjiao1,Liu Nan2,Lam Shao Wei Sean3ORCID,Chia Yew Woon4ORCID,Perkins Gavin D.5,Ong Marcus Eng Hock67ORCID,Ho Andrew Fu Wah68ORCID,Ang Shiang‐Hu,Chen Ruth Weixian,Chan Enoch Hin Kei,Goh Ee Ling,Ho Vui Kian,Lau Hong Khai,Lee Eng Kiang,Leong Benjamin Sieu‐Hon,Lim Jia Hao,Lim Shir Lynn,Loh Julian Kenrick Xingyuan,Ong Jimmy Heng Ann,Peck Kah Hua,Quek Daniel Yong Jing,Seet Christopher Ying Hao,Swarup Shobbit,Yong Thon Hon

Affiliation:

1. Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine National University of Singapore Singapore

2. Centre for Quantitative Medicine Duke‐NUS Medical SchoolNational University of Singapore Singapore

3. Health Services Research Centre SingHealth Duke‐NUS Academic Medical Centre Singapore

4. Department of Cardiology Tan Tock Seng Hospital Singapore

5. Warwick Medical School University of Warwick Coventry United Kingdom

6. Department of Emergency Medicine Singapore General Hospital Singapore

7. Health Services & Systems Research Duke‐NUS Medical School Singapore

8. Pre‐Hospital and Emergency Research Centre Health Services and Systems Research Duke‐NUS Medical School Singapore

Abstract

Background The role of cardiac arrest centers (CACs) in out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest care systems is continuously evolving. Interpretation of existing literature is limited by heterogeneity in CAC characteristics and types of patients transported to CACs. This study assesses the impact of CACs on survival in out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest according to varying definitions of CAC and prespecified subgroups. Methods and Results Electronic databases were searched from inception to March 9, 2021 for relevant studies. Centers were considered CACs if self‐declared by study authors and capable of relevant interventions. Main outcomes were survival and neurologically favorable survival at hospital discharge or 30 days. Meta‐analyses were performed for adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and crude odds ratios. Thirty‐six studies were analyzed. Survival with favorable neurological outcome significantly improved with treatment at CACs (aOR, 1.85 [95% CI, 1.52–2.26]), even when including high‐volume centers (aOR, 1.50 [95% CI, 1.18–1.91]) or including improved‐care centers (aOR, 2.13 [95% CI, 1.75–2.59]) as CACs. Survival significantly increased with treatment at CACs (aOR, 1.92 [95% CI, 1.59–2.32]), even when including high‐volume centers (aOR, 1.74 [95% CI, 1.38–2.18]) or when including improved‐care centers (aOR, 1.97 [95% CI, 1.71–2.26]) as CACs. The treatment effect was more pronounced among patients with shockable rhythm ( P =0.006) and without prehospital return of spontaneous circulation ( P =0.005). Conclusions were robust to sensitivity analyses, with no publication bias detected. Conclusions Care at CACs was associated with improved survival and neurological outcomes for patients with nontraumatic out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest regardless of varying CAC definitions. Patients with shockable rhythms and those without prehospital return of spontaneous circulation benefited more from CACs. Evidence for bypassing hospitals or interhospital transfer remains inconclusive.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3