Importance of Risk Assessment in Timing of Invasive Coronary Evaluation and Treatment of Patients With Non–ST‐Segment–Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: Insights From the VERDICT Trial

Author:

Butt Jawad H.1ORCID,Kofoed Klaus F.1,Kelbæk Henning2,Hansen Peter R.3,Torp‐Pedersen Christian4ORCID,Høfsten Dan1,Holmvang Lene1,Pedersen Frants1,Bang Lia E.1,Sigvardsen Per E.1,Clemmensen Peter56,Linde Jesper J.1ORCID,Heitmann Merete7,Hove Jens Dahlgaard8ORCID,Abdulla Jawdat9,Gislason Gunnar3ORCID,Engstrøm Thomas1,Køber Lars1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiology Rigshospitalet Copenhagen University Hospital Copenhagen Denmark

2. Department of Cardiology Zealand University Hospital Roskilde Denmark

3. Department of Cardiology Herlev‐Gentofte University Hospital Hillerød Denmark

4. Department of Clinical Research and Cardiology Nordsjællands Hospital Hillerød Denmark

5. Department of Regional Research, Clinical Institute Faculty of Health Sciences University of Southern Denmark Odense Denmark

6. Department of Cardiology University Heart Center Hamburg, University Clinic Hamburg‐Eppendorf Hamburg Germany

7. Department of Cardiology Bispebjerg‐Frederiksberg Hospital Bispebjerg Denmark

8. Department of Cardiology Hvidovre‐Amager Hospital Hvidovre Denmark

9. Department of Cardiology Glostrup Hospital Copenhagen University Hospital Glostrup Denmark

Abstract

Background The optimal timing of invasive examination and treatment of high‐risk patients with non–ST‐segment–elevation acute coronary syndrome has not been established. We investigated the efficacy of early invasive coronary angiography compared with standard‐care invasive coronary angiography on the risk of all‐cause mortality according to the GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) risk score in a predefined subgroup analysis of the VERDICT (Very Early Versus Deferred Invasive Evaluation Using Computerized Tomography) trial. Methods and Results Patients with clinical suspicion of non–ST‐segment–elevation acute coronary syndrome with ECG changes indicating new ischemia and/or elevated troponin, in whom invasive coronary angiography was clinically indicated and deemed logistically feasible within 12 hours, were eligible for inclusion. Patients were randomized 1:1 to an early (≤12 hours) or standard (48–72 hours) invasive strategy. The primary outcome of the present study was all‐cause mortality. Of 2147 patients randomized in the VERDICT trial, 2092 patients had an available GRACE risk score. Of these, 1021 (48.8%) patients had a GRACE score >140. During a median follow‐up of 4.1 years, 192 (18.8%) and 54 (5.0%) patients died in the high and low GRACE score groups, respectively. The risk of death with the early invasive strategy was increased in patients with a GRACE score ≤140 (hazard ratio [HR], 2.04 [95% CI, 1.16–3.59]), whereas there was a trend toward a decreased risk of death with the early invasive strategy in patients with a GRACE score >140 (HR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.63–1.10]) ( P interaction =0.006). Conclusions In patients with non–ST‐segment–elevation acute coronary syndrome, we found a significant interaction between timing of invasive coronary angiography and GRACE score on the risk of death. Randomized clinical trials are warranted to establish the efficacy and safety among high‐risk and low‐risk patients with non–ST‐segment–elevation acute coronary syndrome. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02061891.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3