Sex and Race Differences in the Evaluation and Treatment of Young Adults Presenting to the Emergency Department With Chest Pain

Author:

Banco Darcy1,Chang Jerway1,Talmor Nina1ORCID,Wadhera Priya2,Mukhopadhyay Amrita3,Lu Xinlin4ORCID,Dong Siyuan4,Lu Yukun4,Betensky Rebecca A.5ORCID,Blecker Saul15,Safdar Basmah6ORCID,Reynolds Harmony R.7ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine New York University Langone Hospital New York NY

2. Department of Cardiology Boston University Medical Center Boston MA

3. Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology Department of Medicine New York University School of Medicine New York NY

4. Department of Biostatistics New York University School of Global Public Health New York NY

5. Department of Population Health New York University School of Medicine New York NY

6. Department of Emergency Medicine Yale University School of Medicine New Haven CT

7. Sarah Ross Soter Center for Women’s Cardiovascular Research Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology Department of Medicine NYU Grossman School of Medicine New York NY

Abstract

Background Acute myocardial infarctions are increasingly common among young adults. We investigated sex and racial differences in the evaluation of chest pain (CP) among young adults presenting to the emergency department. Methods and Results Emergency department visits for adults aged 18 to 55 years presenting with CP were identified in the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey 2014 to 2018, which uses stratified sampling to produce national estimates. We evaluated associations between sex, race, and CP management before and after multivariable adjustment. We identified 4152 records representing 29 730 145 visits for CP among young adults. Women were less likely than men to be triaged as emergent (19.1% versus 23.3%, respectively, P <0.001), to undergo electrocardiography (74.2% versus 78.8%, respectively, P =0.024), or to be admitted to the hospital or observation unit (12.4% versus 17.9%, respectively, P <0.001), but ordering of cardiac biomarkers was similar. After multivariable adjustment, men were seen more quickly (hazard ratio [HR], 1.15 [95% CI, 1.05–1.26]) and were more likely to be admitted (adjusted odds ratio, 1.40 [95% CI, 1.08–1.81]; P =0.011). People of color waited longer for physician evaluation (HR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.73–0.93]; P <0.001) than White adults after multivariable adjustment, but there were no racial differences in hospital admission, triage level, electrocardiography, or cardiac biomarker testing. Acute myocardial infarction was diagnosed in 1.4% of adults in the emergency department and 6.5% of admitted adults. Conclusions Women and people of color with CP waited longer to be seen by physicians, independent of clinical features. Women were independently less likely to be admitted when presenting with CP. These differences could impact downstream treatment and outcomes.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 30 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3