Re‐CHARGE‐AF: Recalibration of the CHARGE‐AF Model for Atrial Fibrillation Risk Prediction in Patients With Acute Stroke

Author:

Ashburner Jeffrey M.12ORCID,Wang Xin3,Li Xinye3,Khurshid Shaan34ORCID,Ko Darae5ORCID,Trisini Lipsanopoulos Ana3,Lee Priscilla R.3,Carmichael Taylor3,Turner Ashby C.6,Jackson Corban7ORCID,Ellinor Patrick T.38ORCID,Benjamin Emelia J.910ORCID,Atlas Steven J.12,Singer Daniel E.12ORCID,Trinquart Ludovic911ORCID,Lubitz Steven A.38ORCID,Anderson Christopher D.12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of General Internal Medicine Massachusetts General Hospital Boston MA

2. Department of Medicine Harvard Medical School Boston MA

3. Cardiovascular Research Center Massachusetts General Hospital Boston MA

4. Division of Cardiology Massachusetts General Hospital Boston MA

5. Section of Cardiovascular Medicine Boston University School of Medicine Boston MA

6. Department of Neurology Massachusetts General Hospital & Harvard Medical School Boston MA

7. Jackson Heart StudyTougaloo College Tougaloo MS

8. Cardiac Arrhythmia Service Massachusetts General Hospital Boston MA

9. Boston University and National HeartLung, and Blood Institute’s Framingham Heart Study Framingham MA

10. Department of Medicine Department of Epidemiology Sections of Preventive Medicine and Cardiovascular Medicine Boston University School of MedicineBoston University School of Public Heath Boston MA

11. Department of Biostatistics Boston University School of Public Health Boston MA

12. Department of Neurology Brigham and Women’s Hospital Boston MA

Abstract

Background Performance of existing atrial fibrillation (AF) risk prediction models in poststroke populations is unclear. We evaluated predictive utility of an AF risk model in patients with acute stroke and assessed performance of a fully refitted model. Methods and Results Within an academic hospital, we included patients aged 46 to 94 years discharged for acute ischemic stroke between 2003 and 2018. We estimated 5‐year predicted probabilities of AF using the Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology for Atrial Fibrillation (CHARGE‐AF) model, by recalibrating CHARGE‐AF to the baseline risk of the sample, and by fully refitting a Cox proportional hazards model to the stroke sample (Re‐CHARGE‐AF) model. We compared discrimination and calibration between models and used 200 bootstrap samples for optimism‐adjusted measures. Among 551 patients with acute stroke, there were 70 incident AF events over 5 years (cumulative incidence, 15.2%; 95% CI, 10.6%–19.5%). Median predicted 5‐year risk from CHARGE‐AF was 4.8% (quartile 1–quartile 3, 2.0–12.6) and from Re‐CHARGE‐AF was 16.1% (quartile 1–quartile 3, 8.0–26.2). For CHARGE‐AF, discrimination was moderate (C statistic, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.57–0.70) and calibration was poor, underestimating AF risk (Greenwood‐Nam D’Agostino chi‐square, P <0.001). Calibration with recalibrated baseline risk was also poor (Greenwood‐Nam D’Agostino chi‐square, P <0.001). Re‐CHARGE‐AF improved discrimination ( P =0.001) compared with CHARGE‐AF (C statistic, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.68–0.79]; optimism‐adjusted, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.65–0.75]) and was well calibrated (Greenwood‐Nam D’Agostino chi‐square, P =0.97). Conclusions Covariates from an established AF risk model enable accurate estimation of AF risk in a poststroke population after recalibration. A fully refitted model was required to account for varying baseline AF hazard and strength of associations between covariates and incident AF.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3