Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation With and Without Resheathing and Repositioning: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis

Author:

Moroni Francesco1ORCID,Azzalini Lorenzo2ORCID,Sondergaard Lars3,Attizzani Guilherme F.4ORCID,García Santiago5ORCID,Jneid Hani6ORCID,Mamas Mamas A.7ORCID,Bagur Rodrigo78ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Cardiology Pauley Heart CenterVirginia Commonwealth University Richmond VA

2. Division of Cardiology Department of Medicine University of Washington Seattle WA

3. The Heart Centre, RigshospitaletCopenhagen University Hospital Copenhagen Denmark

4. Harrington Heart and Vascular InstituteUniversity Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center Cleveland OH

5. The Carl and Edyth Lindner Center for Research and Education, The Christ Hospital Cincinnati OH

6. Division of Cardiology Baylor School of Medicine and the Michael E. DeBakey VAMC Houston TX

7. Keele Cardiovascular Research Group Centre for Prognosis ResearchInstitute of Primary Care and Health SciencesKeele University Stoke‐on‐Trent United Kingdom

8. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry Western University London Ontario Canada

Abstract

Background There is a concern that resheathing/repositioning of transcatheter heart valves during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) may lead to an increased risk of periprocedural complications. We aimed to evaluate the short‐ and long‐term impact on clinical outcomes of resheathing for repositioning of transcatheter heart valves during TAVI procedures. Methods and Results We conducted a systematic search of Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases to identify studies comparing outcomes between patients requiring resheathing/repositioning during TAVI and those who did not. Random‐effects meta‐analyses were used to estimate the association of resheathing compared with no resheathing with clinical outcomes after TAVI. Seven studies including 4501 participants (pooled mean age, 80.9±7.4 years; 54% women; and 1374 [30.5%] patients requiring resheathing/repositioning) were included in this study. No significant differences between the 2 groups were identified with regards to safety: 30‐day mortality (n=3125; odds ratio [OR], 0.74 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41–1.33]; I 2 =0%), stroke (n=4121; OR, 1.09 [95% CI, 0.74–1.62]; I 2 =0%), coronary obstruction (n=3000; OR, 2.35 [95% CI, 0.17–33.47]; I 2 =75%), major vascular complications (n=3125; OR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.66–1.33]; I 2 =0%), major bleeding (n=3125; OR, 1.13 [95% CI, 0.94–2.01]; I 2 =39%), acute kidney injury (n=3495; OR, 1.30 [95% CI, 0.64–2.62]; I 2 =44%), and efficacy outcomes: device success (n=1196; OR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.51–1.14]; I 2 =0%), need for a second valve (n=3170; OR, 2.86 [95% CI, 0.96–8.48]; I 2 =62%), significant (moderate or higher) paravalvular leak (n=1151; OR, 1.53 [95% CI, 0.83–2.80]; I 2 =0%), and permanent pacemaker implantation (n=1908; OR, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.68–1.57]; I 2 =58%). One‐year mortality was similar between groups (n=1972; OR, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.68–1.47]; I 2 =0%). Conclusions Resheathing of transcatheter heart valves during TAVI is associated with similar periprocedural risk compared with no resheathing in several patient‐important outcomes. These data support the safety of current self‐expanding transcatheter heart valves with resheathing features. Registration URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ ; Unique identifier: CRD42021273715.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3