Affiliation:
1. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine Kyoto Japan
2. Department of Clinical Epidemiology Hyogo College of Medicine Nishinomiya Japan
3. Department of Cardiology Tenri Hospital Tenri Japan
4. Cardiovascular Center Tazuke Kofukai Medical Research Institute, Kitano Hospital Osaka Japan
5. Department of Cardiology Shizuoka General Hospital Shizuoka Japan
6. Department of Cardiovascular Center Osaka Red Cross Hospital Osaka Japan
7. Department of Cardiology Kokura Memorial Hospital Kitakyushu Japan
8. Department of Cardiology Mitsubishi Kyoto Hospital Kyoto Japan
9. Department of Cardiology Juntendo University Shizuoka Hospital Izunokuni Japan
10. Department of Cardiology Kishiwada City Hospital Kishiwada Japan
11. Department of Cardiology Hyogo Prefectural Amagasaki General Medical Center Amagasaki Japan
12. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital Kobe Japan
13. Department of Cardiology Kurashiki Central Hospital Kurashiki Japan
14. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Shiga University of Medical Science Shiga Japan
Abstract
Background
It remains controversial whether long‐term clinical impact of newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation (AF) in the acute phase of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is different from that of prior AF diagnosed before the onset of AMI.
Methods and Results
The current study population from the CREDO‐Kyoto AMI (Coronary Revascularization Demonstrating Outcome Study in Kyoto Acute Myocardial Infarction) Registry Wave‐2 consisted of 6228 patients with AMI who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. The baseline characteristics and long‐term clinical outcomes were compared according to AF status (newly diagnosed AF: N=489 [7.9%], prior AF: N=589 [9.5%], and no AF: N=5150 [82.7%]). Median follow‐up duration was 5.5 years. Patients with newly diagnosed AF and prior AF had similar baseline characteristics with higher risk profile than those with no AF including older age and more comorbidities. The cumulative 5‐year incidence of all‐cause death was higher in newly diagnosed AF and prior AF than no AF (38.8%, 40.7%, and 18.7%,
P
<0.001). The adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for mortality of newly diagnosed AF and prior AF relative to no AF remained significant with similar magnitude (HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.12–1.54;
P
<0.001, and HR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.14–1.52;
P
<0.001, respectively). The cumulative 5‐year incidence of stroke decreased in the order of newly diagnosed AF, prior AF and no AF (15.5%, 12.9%, and 6.3%, respectively,
P
<0.001). The higher adjusted HRs of both newly diagnosed AF and prior AF relative to no AF were significant for stroke, with a greater risk of newly diagnosed AF than that of prior AF (HR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.56–2.69;
P
<0.001, and HR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.00–1.78;
P
=0.048, respectively). The higher stroke risk of newly diagnosed AF compared with prior AF was largely driven by the greater risk within 30 days. The higher adjusted HRs of newly diagnosed AF and prior AF relative to no AF were significant for heart failure hospitalization (HR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.35–2.22;
P
<0.001, and HR, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.82–2.74;
P
<0.001, respectively) and major bleeding (HR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.23–1.73;
P
<0.001, and HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.15–1.60;
P
<0.001, respectively).
Conclusions
Newly diagnosed AF in AMI had risks for mortality, heart failure hospitalization, and major bleeding higher than no AF, and comparable to prior AF. The risk of newly diagnosed AF for stroke might be higher than that of prior AF.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Subject
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine