Blood Pressure Complexity Discriminates Pathological Beat‐to‐Beat Variability as a Marker of Vascular Aging

Author:

Lee Yun‐Kai1ORCID,Mazzucco Sara2ORCID,Rothwell Peter M.2ORCID,Payne Stephen J.1ORCID,Webb Alastair J. S.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Biomedical Engineering Department of Engineering Science University of Oxford UK

2. Wolfson Centre for Prevention of Stroke and DementiaNuffield Department of Clinical NeurosciencesJohn Radcliffe HospitalUniversity of Oxford UK

Abstract

Background Beat‐to‐beat blood pressure variability (BPV) is associated with an increased risk of stroke but can be driven by both healthy physiological processes and failure of compensatory mechanisms. Blood pressure (BP) complexity measures structured, organized variations in BP, as opposed to random fluctuations, and its reduction may therefore identify pathological beat‐to‐beat BPV. Methods and Results In the prospective, population‐based OXVASC (Oxford Vascular Study) Phenotyped Cohort with transient ischemic attack or minor stroke, patients underwent at least 5 minutes of noninvasive beat‐to‐beat monitoring of BP (Finometer) and ECG to derive the following: BPV (coefficient of variation) and complexity (modified multiscale entropy) of systolic BP and diastolic BP, heart rate variability (SD of R‐R intervals), and baroreflex sensitivity (BRS; Welch's method), in low‐ (0.04–0.15 Hz) and high‐frequency (0.15–0.4 Hz) bands. Associations between BPV or BP complexity with autonomic indexes and arterial stiffness were determined (linear regression), unadjusted, and adjusted for age, sex, and cardiovascular risk factors. In 908 consecutive, consenting patients, BP complexity was inversely correlated with BPV coefficient of variation ( P <0.001) and was similarly reduced in patients with hypertension or diabetes ( P <0.001). However, although BPV coefficient of variation had a U‐shaped relationship with age, BP complexity fell systematically across age quintiles (quintile 1: 15.1 [14.0–16.1] versus quintile 5: 13.8 [12.4–15.1]) and was correlated with markers of autonomic dysfunction (heart rate variability SD of R‐R intervals: r  = 0.20; BRS low frequency: 0.19; BRS high frequency: 0.26) and arterial stiffness (pulse wave velocity: −0.21; all P <0.001), even after adjustment for clinical variables (heart rate variability SD of R‐R intervals: 0.12; BRS low frequency and BRS high frequency: 0.13 and 0.17; and pulse wave velocity: −0.07; all P <0.05). Conclusions Loss of BP complexity discriminates BPV because of pathological failure of compensatory mechanisms and may represent a less confounded and potentially modifiable risk factor for stroke.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3