Ongoing Exercise Intolerance Following COVID‐19: A Magnetic Resonance–Augmented Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test Study

Author:

Brown James T.123ORCID,Saigal Anita4ORCID,Karia Nina123,Patel Rishi K.25ORCID,Razvi Yousuf25,Constantinou Natalie23,Steeden Jennifer A.3ORCID,Mandal Swapna4,Kotecha Tushar1236ORCID,Fontana Marianna25,Goldring James4,Muthurangu Vivek3ORCID,Knight Daniel S.1236ORCID

Affiliation:

1. National Pulmonary Hypertension Service Royal Free London NHS Foundation TrustLondon United Kingdom

2. UCL Department of Cardiac MRI University College London (Royal Free Campus) London United Kingdom

3. Institute of Cardiovascular ScienceUniversity College London United Kingdom

4. Department of Respiratory Medicine Royal Free London NHS Foundation TrustLondon United Kingdom

5. National Amyloidosis Centre Division of Medicine University College London United Kingdom

6. Department of Cardiology Royal Free London NHS Foundation TrustLondon United Kingdom

Abstract

Background Ongoing exercise intolerance of unclear cause following COVID‐19 infection is well recognized but poorly understood. We investigated exercise capacity in patients previously hospitalized with COVID‐19 with and without self‐reported exercise intolerance using magnetic resonance–augmented cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Methods and Results Sixty subjects were enrolled in this single‐center prospective observational case‐control study, split into 3 equally sized groups: 2 groups of age‐, sex‐, and comorbidity‐matched previously hospitalized patients following COVID‐19 without clearly identifiable postviral complications and with either self‐reported reduced (COVID reduced ) or fully recovered (COVID normal ) exercise capacity; a group of age‐ and sex‐matched healthy controls. The COVID reduced group had the lowest peak workload (79W [Interquartile range (IQR), 65–100] versus controls 104W [IQR, 86–148]; P =0.01) and shortest exercise duration (13.3±2.8 minutes versus controls 16.6±3.5 minutes; P =0.008), with no differences in these parameters between COVID normal patients and controls. The COVID reduced group had: (1) the lowest peak indexed oxygen uptake (14.9 mL/minper kg [IQR, 13.1–16.2]) versus controls (22.3 mL/min per kg [IQR, 16.9–27.6]; P =0.003) and COVID normal patients (19.1 mL/min per kg [IQR, 15.4–23.7]; P =0.04); (2) the lowest peak indexed cardiac output (4.7±1.2 L/min per m 2 ) versus controls (6.0±1.2 L/min per m 2 ; P =0.004) and COVID normal patients (5.7±1.5 L/min per m 2 ; P =0.02), associated with lower indexed stroke volume (SVi:COVID reduced 39±10 mL/min per m 2 versus COVID normal 43±7 mL/min per m 2 versus controls 48±10 mL/min per m 2 ; P =0.02). There were no differences in peak tissue oxygen extraction or biventricular ejection fractions between groups. There were no associations between COVID‐19 illness severity and peak magnetic resonance–augmented cardiopulmonary exercise testing metrics. Peak indexed oxygen uptake, indexed cardiac output, and indexed stroke volume all correlated with duration from discharge to magnetic resonance–augmented cardiopulmonary exercise testing ( P <0.05). Conclusions Magnetic resonance–augmented cardiopulmonary exercise testing suggests failure to augment stroke volume as a potential mechanism of exercise intolerance in previously hospitalized patients with COVID‐19. This is unrelated to disease severity and, reassuringly, improves with time from acute illness.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3