Invasive Versus Medical Management in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease and Non–ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Author:

Majmundar Monil1ORCID,Ibarra Gabriel2,Kumar Ashish3ORCID,Doshi Rajkumar4,Shah Palak5,Mehran Roxana6ORCID,Reed Grant W.7ORCID,Puri Rishi7,Kapadia Samir R.7ORCID,Bangalore Sripal8ORCID,Kalra Ankur9ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiology Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn New York NY

2. Department of Internal Medicine Brown University Providence RI

3. Department of Internal Medicine Cleveland Clinic Akron General Akron OH

4. Division of Cardiology St. Joseph’s University Medical Center Paterson NJ

5. Department of Internal Medicine New York Medical College/Metropolitan Hospital New York NY

6. The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular InstituteIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York NY

7. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic Cleveland OH

8. New York University Grossman School of Medicine New York NY

9. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine Krannert Cardiovascular Research CenterIndiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis IN

Abstract

Background The role of invasive management compared with medical management in patients with non–ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) is uncertain, given the increased risk of procedural complications in patients with CKD. We aimed to compare clinical outcomes of invasive management with medical management in patients with NSTEMI‐CKD. Methods and Results We identified NSTEMI and CKD stages 3, 4, 5, and end‐stage renal disease admissions using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification ( ICD‐10‐CM ) codes from the Nationwide Readmission Database 2016 to 2018. Patients were stratified into invasive and medical management. Primary outcome was mortality (in‐hospital and 6 months after discharge). Secondary outcomes were in‐hospital postprocedural complications (acute kidney injury requiring dialysis, major bleeding) and postdischarge 6‐month safety and major adverse cardiovascular events. Out of 141 052 patients with NSTEMI‐CKD, 85 875 (60.9%) were treated with invasive management, whereas 55 177 (39.1%) patients were managed medically. In propensity‐score matched cohorts, invasive strategy was associated with lower in‐hospital (CKD 3: odds ratio [OR], 0.47 [95% CI, 0.43–0.51]; P <0.001; CKD 4: OR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.69–0.89]; P <0.001; CKD 5: OR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.49–1.06]; P =0.096; end‐stage renal disease: OR, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.46–0.56]; P <0.001) and 6‐month mortality. Invasive management was associated with higher in‐hospital postprocedural complications but no difference in postdischarge safety outcomes. Invasive management was associated with a lower hazard of major adverse cardiovascular events at 6 months in all CKD groups compared with medical management. Conclusions Invasive management was associated with lower mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events but minimal increased in‐hospital complications in patients with NSTEMI‐CKD compared with medical management, suggesting patients with NSTEMI‐CKD should be offered invasive management.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3