Claims‐Based Score for the Prediction of Bleeding in a Contemporary Cohort of Patients Receiving Oral Anticoagulation for Venous Thromboembolism

Author:

Alonso Alvaro1ORCID,Norby Faye L.23ORCID,MacLehose Richard F.3,Zakai Neil A.4ORCID,Walker Rob F.3,Adam Terrence J.5,Lutsey Pamela L.3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Epidemiology Rollins School of Public Health Emory University Atlanta GA

2. Center for Cardiac Arrest Prevention Department of Cardiology Cedars‐Sinai Smidt Heart Institute Los Angeles CA

3. Division of Epidemiology and Community Health School of Public Health University of Minnesota Minneapolis MN

4. Division of Hematology/Oncology Department of Medicine and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont Burlington VT

5. Department of Pharmaceutical Care and Health Systems College of Pharmacy University of Minnesota Minneapolis MN

Abstract

Background Current scores for bleeding risk assessment in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) undergoing oral anticoagulation have limited predictive capacity. We developed and internally validated a bleeding prediction model using healthcare claims data. Methods and Results We selected patients with incident VTE initiating oral anticoagulation in the 2011 to 2017 MarketScan databases. Hospitalized bleeding events were identified using validated algorithms in the 180 days after VTE diagnosis. We evaluated demographic factors, comorbidities, and medication use before oral anticoagulation initiation as potential predictors of bleeding using stepwise selection of variables in Cox models run on 1000 bootstrap samples of the patient population. Variables included in >60% of all models were selected for the final analysis. We internally validated the model using bootstrapping and correcting for optimism. We included 165 434 patients with VTE and initiating oral anticoagulation, of whom 2294 had a bleeding event. After undergoing the variable selection process, the final model included 20 terms (15 main effects and 5 interactions). The c‐statistic for the final model was 0.68 (95% CI, 0.67–0.69). The internally validated c‐statistic corrected for optimism was 0.68 (95% CI, 0.67–0.69). For comparison, the c‐statistic of the Hypertension, Abnormal Renal/Liver Function, Stroke, Bleeding History or Predisposition, Labile International Normalized Ratio, Elderly (>65 Years), Drugs/Alcohol Concomitantly (HAS‐BLED) score in this population was 0.62 (95% CI, 0.61–0.63). Conclusions We have developed a novel model for bleeding prediction in VTE using large healthcare claims databases. Performance of the model was moderately good, highlighting the urgent need to identify better predictors of bleeding to inform treatment decisions.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3