Evidence-Based Policy Making for Public Health Interventions in Cardiovascular Diseases: Formally Assessing the Feasibility of Clinical Trials

Author:

Foti Kathryn12,Foraker Randi E.3ORCID,Martyn-Nemeth Pamela4ORCID,Anderson Cheryl A.M.25ORCID,Cook Nancy R.6ORCID,Lichtenstein Alice H.7ORCID,de Ferranti Sarah D.89,Young Deborah Rohm10,Hivert Marie-France1112,Ross Robert13,Deedwania Prakash14,Whitsel Laurie P.15,Appel Lawrence J.1216ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology, and Clinical Research, Baltimore, MD (K.F., L.J.A.).

2. Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD (K.F., C.A.M.A., L.J.A.).

3. Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, MO (R.E.F.).

4. Department of Biobehavioral Nursing Science, University of Illinois at Chicago (P.M.-N.).

5. Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, UC San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA (C.A.M.A.).

6. Division of Preventive Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (N.R.C.).

7. Cardiovascular Nutrition Laboratory, Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging, Tufts University, Boston, MA (A.H.L.).

8. Department of Cardiology, Boston Children’s Hospital, MA (S.D.d.F.).

9. Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (S.D.d.F.).

10. Division of Behavioral Research, Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena (D.R.Y.).

11. Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA (M.-F.H.).

12. Diabetes Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (M.-F.H.).

13. School of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (R.R.).

14. School of Medicine, University of California at San Francisco, Fresno (P.D.).

15. Department of Policy Research and Translation, American Heart Association, Washington, DC (L.P.W.).

16. Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD (L.J.A.).

Abstract

Implementation of prevention policies has often been impeded or delayed due to the lack of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with hard clinical outcomes (eg, incident disease, mortality). Despite the prominent role of RCTs in health care, it may not always be feasible to conduct RCTs of public health interventions with hard outcomes due to logistical and ethical considerations. RCTs may also lack external validity and have limited generalizability. Currently, there is insufficient guidance for policymakers charged with establishing evidence-based policy to determine whether an RCT with hard outcomes is needed before policy recommendations. In this context, the purpose of this article is to assess, in a case study, the feasibility of conducting an RCT of the oft-cited issue of sodium reduction on cardiovascular outcomes and then propose a framework for decision-making, which includes an assessment of the feasibility of conducting an RCT with hard clinical outcomes when such trials are unavailable. We designed and assessed the feasibility of potential individual- and cluster-randomized trials of sodium reduction on cardiovascular outcomes. Based on our assumptions, a trial using any of the designs considered would require tens of thousands of participants and cost hundreds of millions of dollars, which is prohibitively expensive. Our estimates may be conservative given several key challenges, such as the unknown costs of sustaining a long-term difference in sodium intake, the effect of differential cotreatment with antihypertensive medications, and long lag time to clinical outcomes. Thus, it would be extraordinarily difficult to conduct such a trial, and despite the high costs, would still be at substantial risk for a spuriously null result. A robust framework, such as the one we developed, should be used to guide policymakers when establishing evidence-based public health interventions in the absence of trials with hard clinical outcomes.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Reference52 articles.

1. Evidence-Based Policy Making Collaborative. Principles of evidence-based policymaking. September 2016. https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/99739/principles_of_evidence-based_policymaking.pdf. Accessed June 1 2020

2. Evidence-Based Policy Making: Assessment of the American Heart Association’s Strategic Policy Portfolio

3. Understanding Nutritional Epidemiology and Its Role in Policy

4. Smoke-free air policies: past, present and future

5. The development of scientific evidence for health policies for obesity: why and how?

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3