Variation in Cardiac Rehabilitation Participation During Aortic Valve Replacement Episodes of Care

Author:

Guduguntla Vinay12,Yaser Jessica M.2,Keteyian Steven J.3,Pagani Francis D.45,Likosky Donald S.4ORCID,Sukul Devraj16ORCID,Thompson Michael P.245ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Internal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (V.G.).

2. Michigan Value Collaborative, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (V.G., J.M.Y., M.P.T.).

3. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI (S.J.K.).

4. Department of Cardiac Surgery, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor (F.D.P., D.S.L., M.P.T.).

5. Michigan Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons Quality Collaborative, Ann Arbor, MI (F.D.P., D.S.L., M.P.T.).

6. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor (D.S.).

Abstract

Background: Despite reported benefit in the setting of aortic valve replacement (AVR), cardiac rehabilitation (CR) utilization remains low, with few studies evaluating hospital and patient-level variation in CR participation. We explored determinants of CR variability during AVR episodes of care: transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Methods: A cohort of 10 124 AVR episodes of care (TAVR n=5121 from 24 hospitals; SAVR n=5003 from 32 hospitals) were identified from the Michigan Value Collaborative statewide multipayer registry (2015–2019). CR enrollment was defined as the presence of a single professional or facility claim within 90 days of discharge: 93 797, 93 798, G0422, G0423. Annual trends and hospital variation in CR were described for TAVR, SAVR, and all AVR. Multilevel logistic regression was used to estimate effects of predictors and hospital risk-adjusted rates of CR enrollment. Results: Overall, 4027 (39.8%) patients enrolled in CR, with significant differences by treatment strategy: SAVR=50.9%, TAVR=28.9% ( P <0.001). CR use after SAVR was significantly higher than after TAVR and increased over time for both modalities ( P <0.001). There were significant differences in CR enrollment across age, gender, payer, and some comorbidities ( P <0.05). At the hospital level, CR participation rates for all AVR varied 10-fold (4.8% to 68.7%) and were moderately correlated between SAVR and TAVR (Pearson r =0.56, P <0.01). Conclusions: Substantial variation exists in CR participation during AVR episodes of care across hospitals. However, within-hospital CR participation rates were significantly correlated across treatment strategies. These findings suggest that CR participation is the product of hospital-specific practice patterns. Identifying hospital practices associated with higher CR participation can help assist future quality improvement efforts to increase CR use after AVR.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3