Total Center Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Volume and 30-Day Mortality

Author:

O’Neill Darragh1,Nicholas Owen1,Gale Chris P.1,Ludman Peter1,de Belder Mark A.1,Timmis Adam1,Fox Keith A.A.1,Simpson Iain A1,Redwood Simon1,Ray Simon G.1

Affiliation:

1. From the Research Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, United Kingdom (D.O., O.N.); Leeds Institute for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, United Kingdom (C.P.G.); Department of Cardiology, York Teaching Hospital, United Kingdom (C.P.G.); Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom (P.L.); The James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom (M.A.d.B.); NIHR Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Barts Heart Centre,...

Abstract

Background— The relationship between procedural volume and prognosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains uncertain, with some studies finding in favor of an inverse association and some against. This UK study provides a contemporary reassessment in one of the few countries in the world with a nationally representative PCI registry. Methods and Results— A nationwide cohort study was performed using the national British Cardiovascular Intervention Society registry. All adult patients undergoing PCI in 93 English and Welsh NHS hospitals between 2007 and 2013 were analyzed using hierarchical modeling with adjustment for patient risk. Of 427 467 procedures (22.0% primary PCI) in 93 hospitals, 30-day mortality was 1.9% (4.8% primary PCI). 87.1% of centers undertook between 200 and 2000 procedures annually. Case mix varied with center volume. In centers with 200 to 399 PCI cases per year, a smaller proportion were PCI for ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction (8.4%) than in centers with 1500 to 1999 PCI cases per year (24.2%), but proportionally more were for ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock (8.4% versus 4.3%). For the overall PCI cohort, after risk adjustment, there was no significant evidence of worse, or better, outcomes in lower volume centers from our own study, or in combination with results from other studies. For primary PCI, there was also no evidence for increased or decreased mortality in lower volume centers. Conclusions— After adjustment for differences in case mix and clinical presentation, this study supports the conclusion of no trend for increased mortality in lower volume centers for PCI in the UK healthcare system. Clinical Trial Registration— https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02184949.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Reference35 articles.

1. 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Executive Summary

2. Canadian quality indicators for percutaneous coronary interventions

3. 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization

4. British Cardiovascular Intervention Society. Statement on the development and peer review of new PCI services. http://www.bcis.org.uk/resources/BCIS_New_Site_Guidance_31012011.pdf Published January 1 2011. Accessed January 6 2015.

5. Myocardial infarction centres: the way forward

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3