Abstract 190: Use of Intensive Glycemic Management in Older Adults With Diabetes. An Analysis From the Diabetes Collaborative Registry

Author:

Arnold Suzanne V1,Lipska Kasia J2,Wang Jingyan3,Seman Leo4,Mehta Sanjeev N5,Kosiborod Mikhail1

Affiliation:

1. Mid America Heart Inst and UMKC, Kansas City, MO

2. Yale Univ Sch of Medicine, New Haven, CT

3. Mid America Heart Inst, Kansas City, MO

4. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Ridgefield, CT

5. Joslin Diabetes Cntr, Boston, MA

Abstract

Background: Older adults with diabetes are less likely to benefit and more likely to be harmed by intensive glucose control. Prior research has shown that many older adults continue to be intensively managed despite guidelines that recommend that treatment targets should be relaxed in these patients. As many new agents have been introduced with minimal risk of hypoglycemia, we examined contemporary data to understand to what extent older patients with diabetes are still intensively managed with agents that can cause hypoglycemia. Methods: We examined A1c and treatment data in adults ≥75 years with type 2 diabetes from 151 US outpatient sites in DCR. Patients were categorized as poor control (A1c >9%), moderate control (A1c >8-9%), conservative control (A1c 7-8%), tight control/low-risk agents (A1c <7% on meds with low risk for hypoglycemia), and tight control/high-risk agents (A1c <7% on insulin, sulfonylureas, or meglitinides). Adults with A1c <7% on no glucose-lowering medications were excluded. We used hierarchical logistic regression to examine patient and site factors associated with tight control/high-risk agents vs. conservative control or tight control/low-risk agents. Results: Among 30,696 older adults with diabetes, 5,596 (18%) had moderate or poor control, 9,227 (30%) conservative control, 7,893 (26%) tight control/low-risk agents, and 7,980 (26%) tight control/high-risk agents (Fig. A). Older age, male sex, heart failure, chronic kidney disease, and coronary artery disease were each independently associated with a greater odds of tight control/high-risk agents (Fig. B). After adjusting for patient factors, there were no differences among practice specialties (endocrinology, primary care, cardiology) in how aggressively patients were managed. Conclusion: Despite greater availability of agents that do not cause hypoglycemia, a quarter of older adults with type 2 diabetes are tightly controlled with high-risk medications. These results suggest potential overtreatment of a substantial proportion of patients. Efforts are needed to provide more specific guidance on how to safely treat older adults with diabetes (both through targeting treatment with low-risk agents and through de-escalation of glucose control) and then to efficiently translate that guidance into busy clinical practice.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3