Sustainable Approach to Justice, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Through Better Quality Measurement

Author:

Okeke Nkem12,Hennessey Kerrilynn C.3ORCID,Sitapati Amy M.4ORCID,Weisshaar Dana5ORCID,Shah Nishant P.6ORCID,Alicki Rebecca7ORCID,Haft Howard8ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Medicalincs, Silver Spring, MD (N.O.).

2. Harvard Medical School, Center for Primary Care, Boston, MA (N.O.).

3. Department of Medicine, Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Dartmouth Hitchcock Health, Lebanon, NH (K.C.H.).

4. Division of Biomedical Informatics, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego Health (A.M.S.).

5. Institute of Medical Educators, Kaiser Permanente Santa Clara, CA (D.W.).

6. Duke University School of Medicine, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC (N.P.S).

7. American Heart Association, Department of Quality, Outcomes Research and Analytics, Dallas, TX (R.A.).

8. University of Maryland School of Medicine, Division of Health Sciences and Human Services, Baltimore (H.H.).

Abstract

The US health care industry has broadly adopted performance and quality measures that are extracted from electronic health records and connected to payment incentives that hope to improve declining life expectancy and health status and reduce costs. While the development of a quality measurement infrastructure based on electronic health record data was an important first step in addressing US health outcomes, these metrics, reflecting the average performance across diverse populations, do not adequately adjust for population demographic differences, social determinants of health, or ecosystem vulnerability. Like society as a whole, health care must confront the powerful impact that social determinants of health, race, ethnicity, and other demographic variations have on key health care performance indicators and quality metrics. Tools that are currently available to capture and report the health status of Americans lack the granularity, complexity, and standardization needed to improve health and address disparities at the local level. In this article, we discuss the current and future state of electronic clinical quality measures through a lens of equity.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3