Approval, Evidence, and “Off-Label” Device Utilization: The Patent Foramen Ovale Closure Story

Author:

Goldsweig Andrew M.1ORCID,Deng Yihong2,Yao Xiaoxi2ORCID,Desai Nihar R.3ORCID,Cohen David J.45ORCID,Aronow Herbert D.6ORCID,Messé Steven R.7ORCID,Ross Joseph S.89ORCID,Lansky Alexandra J.3ORCID,Savitz Samuel T.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, MA (A.M.G.).

2. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery and Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (Y.D., X.Y., S.T.S.).

3. Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT (N.R.D., A.J.L.).

4. Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY (D.J.C.).

5. St. Francis Hospital and Heart Center, Roslyn, NY (D.J.C.).

6. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI (H.D.A.).

7. Department of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.M.).

8. Section of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (J.S.R.).

9. Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT (J.S.R.).

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Following regulatory approval, medical devices may be used “off-label.” Patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure is indicated to reduce recurrent stroke but has been proposed for other indications, including migraine, transient ischemic attack, and diving decompression illness. We sought to evaluate PFO closure rates and indications relative to the timing of regulatory approval and publication of key randomized trials. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study using the OptumLabs Data Warehouse of US commercial insurance enrollees from 2006 to 2019. We quantified PFO closure among individuals with ≥2 years of preprocedure coverage to establish indications, classified hierarchically as stroke/systemic embolism, migraine, transient ischemia attack, or other. RESULTS: We identified 5315 patients undergoing PFO closure (51.8% female, 29.2%≥60 years old), which increased from 4.75 per 100 000 person-years in 2006 to 6.60 per 100 000 person-years in 2019. Patients aged ≥60 years accounted for 29.2% of closures. Procedure volumes corresponded weakly with supportive clinical publications and device approval. Among patients with PFO closure, 58.6% underwent closure for stroke/systemic embolism, 10.2% for transient ischemia attack, 8.8% for migraine, and 22.4% for other indications; 17.6% of patients had atrial fibrillation at baseline; and 11.9% developed atrial fibrillation postprocedure. Those aged ≥60 years and male were less likely to undergo closure for migraine than stroke/systemic embolism. CONCLUSIONS: From 2006 to 2019, PFO closure use was consistently low and corresponded weakly with clinical trial publications and regulatory status. Nearly half of patients underwent PFO closure for indications unapproved by the Food and Drug Administration. Regulators and payers should coordinate mechanisms to promote utilization for approved indications to ensure patient safety and should facilitate clinical trials for other possible indications.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Reference40 articles.

1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Approval Order for the AMPLATZER PFO Ocluder (P120021). Accessed August 4 2013. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf12/P120021A.pdf

2. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Approval Order for the GORE CARDIOFORM Septal Occluder. Accessed August 4 2017. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf5/P050006S060A.pdf

3. Long-Term Outcomes of Patent Foramen Ovale Closure or Medical Therapy after Stroke

4. Patent Foramen Ovale Closure or Antiplatelet Therapy for Cryptogenic Stroke

5. Patent Foramen Ovale Closure or Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelets after Stroke

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Navigating the Gray: The Complex Story of PFO Closure Utilization;Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes;2024-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3