Contemporary Patients With Congenital Heart Disease

Author:

Brouwer Charlotte1ORCID,Hebe Joachim2,Lukac Peter3ORCID,Nürnberg Jan-Hendrik2ORCID,Cosedis Nielsen Jens3ORCID,de Riva Silva Marta1ORCID,Blom Nico4ORCID,Hazekamp Mark5ORCID,Zeppenfeld Katja1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiology (C.B., M.d.R., K.Z.), Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands.

2. Center for Electrophysiology, Bremen, Germany (J.H., J.-H.N.).

3. Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (P.L., J.C.N.).

4. Department of Pediatric Cardiology (N.B.), Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands.

5. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands (M.H).

Abstract

Background: Poor outcome after atrial tachycardia (AT) radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) in repaired congenital heart disease (CHD) has been attributed to CHD complexity. This may not apply to contemporary patients. The objective of our study was to assess outcome after RFCA for AT in contemporary patients with CHD according to prior atrial surgery and predefined procedural endpoints. Methods: Patients with CHD referred for AT RFCA to 3 European centers were classified as no atrial surgery/cannulation only, limited or extensive prior atrial surgery. Procedural success was predefined as termination and nonreinducibility for focal AT and bidirectional block across ablation lines for intra-atrial reentrant tachycardia and after empirical substrate ablation for noninducible patients. Patients were followed for AT recurrence and mortality. Results: Ablation was performed in 290 patients (41±17 years, 59% male; 3-dimensional mapping 89%, irrigated tip catheters 90%, transbaffle access 15%). In 197, 233 AT were targeted (196 intra-atrial reentrant tachycardia [64% cavotricuspid (mitral) isthmus–dependent, 33% systemic-venous incision–dependent] and 37 focal AT). In 93 noninducible patients, empirical substrate ablation was performed. Procedural success was achieved in 209 (84%) patients. AT recurred in 148 (54%) 10 (interquartile range, 0–25) months after RFCA. AT-free survival was significantly better in patients with no atrial repair/cannulation only and in patients with complete procedural success independently of CHD complexity. From 94 patients undergoing reablation, the initially targeted substrate had recovered in 64%. Conclusions: In contemporary patients with CHD, outcome after AT ablation is associated with presence of prior atrial surgery and achievement of predefined procedural endpoints rather than CHD complexity. Techniques to improve lesion durability are likely to further improve long-term outcome.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3