Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Adult Congenital Heart Disease: An International Multicenter Registry Study

Author:

Griffiths Jack R.1,Nussinovitch Udi2ORCID,Liang Jackson J.3ORCID,Sims Richard4,Yoneda Zachary T.4ORCID,Bernstein Hannah M.5ORCID,Viswanathan Mohan N.2ORCID,Khairy Paul6ORCID,Srivatsa Uma N.5ORCID,Frankel David S.7ORCID,Marchlinski Francis E.7,Sandhu Amneet8ORCID,Shoemaker M. Benjamin4ORCID,Mohanty Sanghamitra9,Burkhardt John D.9,Natale Andrea9ORCID,Lakireddy Dhanunjaya10ORCID,De Groot Natasja M.S.11ORCID,Gerstenfeld Edward P.12ORCID,Moore Jeremy P.13ORCID,Ávila Pablo14ORCID,Ernst Sabine1ORCID,Nguyen Duy T.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Royal Brompton Hospital (Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust) & National Heart Lung Institute, Imperial College London, United Kingdom (J.R.G., S.E.).

2. Section of Electrophysiology, Cardiology Division, Stanford University, CA (U.N., M.N.V., D.T.N.).

3. Electrophysiology, Division of Cardiology, Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (J.J.L.).

4. Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN (R.S., Z.T.Y., M.B.S.).

5. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of California Davis, Sacramento (H.M.B., U.N.S.).

6. Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Canada (P.K.).

7. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (D.S.F., F.E.M.).

8. Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology Section, Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (A.S.).

9. Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute, Austin (S.M., J.D.B., A.N.).

10. Kansas City Heart Rhythm Institute, Kansas City, KS (D.L.).

11. Department of Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (N.M.S.D.G.).

12. Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Division of Cardiology, University of California San Francisco (E.P.G.).

13. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, UCLA Medical Center, Ahmanson/UCLA Adult Congenital Heart Disease Center & UCLA Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, UCLA Health System, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA (J.P.M.).

14. Cardiology Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain (P.A.).

Abstract

Background: Data on atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation and outcomes are limited in patients with congenital heart disease (CHD). We aimed to investigate the characteristics of patients with CHD presenting for AF ablation and their outcomes. Methods: A multicenter, retrospective analysis was performed of patients with CHD undergoing AF ablation between 2004 and 2020 at 13 participating centers. The severity of CHD was classified using 2014 Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society/Heart Rhythm Society guidelines. Clinical data were collected. One-year complete procedural success was defined as freedom from atrial tachycardia or AF in the absence of antiarrhythmic drugs or including previously failed antiarrhythmic drugs (partial success). Results: Of 240 patients, 127 (53.4%) had persistent AF, 62.5% were male, and mean age was 55.2±13.3 years. CHD complexity categories included 147 (61.3%) simple, 68 (28.3%) intermediate, and 25 (10.4%) severe. The most common CHD type was atrial septal defect (n=78). More complex CHD conditions included transposition of the great arteries (n=14), anomalous pulmonary veins (n=13), tetralogy of Fallot (n=8), cor triatriatum (n=7), single ventricle physiology (n=2), among others. The majority (71.3%) of patients had trialed at least one antiarrhythmic drug. Forty-six patients (22.1%) had reduced systemic ventricular ejection fraction <50%, and mean left atrial diameter was 44.1±8.2 mm. Pulmonary vein isolation was performed in 227 patients (94.6%); additional ablation included left atrial linear ablations (40%), complex fractionated atrial electrogram (19.2%), and cavotricuspid isthmus ablation (40.8%). One-year complete and partial success rates were 45.0% and 20.5%, respectively, with no significant difference in the rate of complete success between complexity groups. Overall, 38 patients (15.8%) required more than one ablation procedure. There were 3 (1.3%) major and 13 (5.4%) minor procedural complications. Conclusions: AF ablation in CHD was safe and resulted in AF control in a majority of patients, regardless of complexity. Future work should address the most appropriate ablation targets in this challenging population.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3