Intracardiac Echocardiography–Guided Implantation for Proximal Left Bundle Branch Pacing

Author:

Kuang XiaoHui1ORCID,Zhang Xi12ORCID,Cui YanJu1,Wei FeiYu1,Wu Peng1,Gao XiaoLong1,Xiang Hong1,Wu HaiYan1,Wang Li-Lin1,Zhou Xiaohong1,Huang Weijian3ORCID,Fan Jie1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Cardiology, Yunnan Arrhythmia Research Center, the First People’s Hospital of Yunnan Province, the Affiliated Hospital of Kunming University of Science and Technology, China (X.K., X.Z., Y.C., F.W., P.W., X.G., H.X., H.W., L.-L.W., J.F.).

2. CRHF Division, Medtronic PLC, Mounds View, MN (X.Z.).

3. Department of Cardiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, China (W.H.).

Abstract

Background: Multiple screw-in attempts under fluoroscopy are often needed to place the pacing lead tip near or at the left bundle branch (LBB). This study was conducted to evaluate the feasibility of implanting an LBB pacing lead in the proximal LBB (PLBB) guided by intracardiac echocardiography (ICE). Methods: The distribution of the LBB was initially determined by ICE anatomic imaging and 3-dimensional electrical mapping of His and LBB potentials in 20 patients in the first parts of the study. In the second part, 101 consecutive pacemaker-indicated patients were randomized into the ICE-guided and non-ICE groups for LBB pacing implantation. The procedural details and electrophysiological characteristics of the 2 groups were compared. Results: In the first part of the study, PLBB was identified at 10 to 20 mm from the tricuspid annulus toward the apex with an area of 4.5±1.1 cm 2 . In the second part, the number of lead screw-in attempts in the septum was fewer in the ICE group than in the non-ICE group (1.43±0.62 versus 1.98±0.75, P =0.0002). The duration of the procedure (26±8 versus 43±9 minutes, P <0.001) and fluoroscopy for LBB pacing implantation (7.4±1.8 versus 10.7±2.4 minutes, P <0.001) in the ICE group was significantly shorter than those in the non-ICE group. LBB pacing in the ICE group generated a lesser QRS duration with more cases of LBB trunk pacing (46.8% versus 25%, P =0.031) and PLBB (91.5% versus 72.7%, P =0.0267) pacing compared with that in the non-ICE group. Conclusions: The basal left ventricular septum can be better visualized using ICE. ICE-guided PLBB pacing is feasible and safe, with a shorter duration required for the procedure and fluoroscopy, and generates greater LBB trunk pacing and PLBB pacing.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3