A Mechanistic Clinical Trial Using ( R )- Versus (S )-Propafenone to Test RyR2 (Ryanodine Receptor) Inhibition for the Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation Induction

Author:

Shoemaker M. Benjamin1ORCID,Yoneda Zachary T.1ORCID,Crawford Diane M.1,Akers Wendell S.23,Richardson Travis1ORCID,Montgomery Jay A.1ORCID,Phillips Sharon4ORCID,Shyr Yu4ORCID,Saavedra Pablo1,Estrada Juan C.1,Kanagasundram Arvindh1ORCID,Shen Sharon T.1ORCID,Michaud Gregory F.1,Crossley George1,Ellis Christopher R.1ORCID,Knollmann Bjorn C.52ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Cardiology (M.B.S., Z.T.Y., D.M.C., T.R., J.A.M., P.S., J.C.E., A.K., S.T.S., G. F. M., G.C., C.R.E.), Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center

2. Department of Pharmacology (W.S.A., B.C.K.), Vanderbilt University School of Medicine

3. Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences (W.S.A.), Lipscomb University College of Pharmacy

4. Department of Biostatistics (S.P., Y.S.), Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN.

5. Division of Clinical Pharmacology (B.C.K.), Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Abstract

Background: Experimental data suggest ryanodine receptor-mediated intracellular calcium leak is a mechanism for atrial fibrillation (AF), but evidence in humans is still needed. Propafenone is composed of two enantiomers that are equally potent sodium-channel blockers; however, (R )-propafenone is an ryanodine receptor inhibitor whereas (S )-propafenone is not. This study tested the hypothesis that ryanodine receptor inhibition with (R )-propafenone prevents induction of AF compared to (S )-propafenone or placebo in patients referred for AF ablation. Methods: Participants were randomized 4:4:1 to a one-time intravenous dose of (R )-propafenone, (S )-propafenone, or placebo. The study drug was given at the start of the procedure and an AF induction protocol using rapid atrial pacing was performed before ablation. The primary endpoint was 30 s of AF or atrial flutter. Results: A total of 193 participants were enrolled and 165 (85%) completed the study protocol (median age: 63 years, 58% male, 95% paroxysmal AF). Sustained AF and/or atrial flutter was induced in 60 participants (84.5%) receiving (R )-propafenone, 60 (80.0%) receiving (S )-propafenone group, and 12 (63.2%) receiving placebo. Atrial flutter occurred significantly more often in the (R )-propafenone (N=23, 32.4%) and (S )-propafenone (N=26, 34.7%) groups compared to placebo (N=1, 5.3%, P =0.029). There was no significant difference between (R )-propafenone and (S )-propafenone for the primary outcome of AF and/or atrial flutter induction in univariable ( P =0.522) or multivariable analysis ( P =0.199, adjusted for age and serum drug level). Conclusions: There is no difference in AF inducibility between (R )-propafenone and (S )-propafenone at clinically relevant concentrations. These results are confounded by a high rate of inducible atrial flutter due to sodium-channel blockade. Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique Identifier: NCT02710669.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3