Pulsed Field Ablation of the Porcine Ventricle Using a Focal Lattice-Tip Catheter

Author:

Kawamura Iwanari1ORCID,Reddy Vivek Y.1ORCID,Wang Bingyan J.2ORCID,Dukkipati Srinivas R.1ORCID,Chaudhry Hina W.2,Santos-Gallego Carlos G3ORCID,Koruth Jacob S.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Helmsley Electrophysiology Center (I.K., V.Y.R., S.R.D., J.S.K.), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.

2. Cardiovascular Regenerative Medicine (B.J.W., H.W.C.), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.

3. Atherothrombosis Research Unit, Department of Cardiology (C.G.S.-G.), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.

Abstract

Background: Our understanding of catheter-based pulsed field ablation (PFA) of the ventricular myocardium is limited. We conducted a series of exploratory evaluations of ventricular PFA in swine ventricles. Methods: A focal lattice-tip catheter was used to deliver proprietary biphasic monopolar PFA applications to swine ventricles under general anesthesia, with guidance from electroanatomical mapping, fluoroscopy, and intracardiac echocardiography. We conducted experiments to assess the impact of (1) delivery repetition (2×, 3×, or 4×) at each location, (2) epicardial PFA delivery, and (3) confluent areas of shallow healed endocardial scar created by prior PFA (4 weeks earlier) on subsequent endocardial PFA. Additional assessments included PFA optimized for the ventricle, lesion visualization by intracardiac echocardiography imaging, and immunohistochemical insights. Results: Experiment no. 1: lesions (n=49) were larger with delivery repetition of either 4× or 3× versus 2×: length 17.6±3.9 or 14.2±2.0 versus 12.7±2.0 mm ( P <0.01, P =0.22), width 13.4±1.8 or 10.6±1.3 versus 10.5±1.1 mm ( P <0.01, P =1.00), and depth 6.1±2.1 or 5.1±1.3 versus 4.2±1.0 mm ( P <0.01, P =0.21). Experiment no. 2: epicardial lesions (n=18) were reliably created and comparable to endocardial lesions: length 24.6±9.7 mm (n=5), width 15.6±4.6 mm, and depth 4.5±3.7 mm. Experiment no. 3: PFA (n=16) was able to penetrate to a depth of 4.8 (interquartile range, 4.5–5.4) mm in healthy myocardium versus 5.6 (interquartile range, 3.6–6.6) mm in adjacent healed endocardial scar ( P =0.79), suggesting that superficial scar does not significantly impair PFA. Finally, we demonstrate, PFA optimized for the ventricle yielded adequate lesion dimensions, can result in myocardial activation, can be visualized by intracardiac echocardiography, and have unique immunohistochemical characteristics. Conclusions: This in vivo evaluation offers insights into the behavior of endocardial or epicardial PFA delivered using the lattice-tip catheter to normal or scarred porcine ventricular myocardium, thereby setting the stage for future clinical studies.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 25 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3