Spatial Accuracy of a Clinically Established Noninvasive Electrocardiographic Imaging System for the Detection of Focal Activation in an Intact Porcine Model

Author:

Hohmann Stephan1,Rettmann Maryam E.1,Konishi Hiroki1,Borenstein Anna2,Wang Songyun1,Suzuki Atsushi1,Michalak Gregory J.3,Monahan Kristi H.1,Parker Kay D.1,Newman L. Katie1,Packer Douglas L.1

Affiliation:

1. Translational Interventional Electrophysiology Laboratory (S.H., M.E.R., H.K., S.W., A.S., K.H.M., K.D.P., L.K.N., D.L.P.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

2. Medtronic, Inc, Cleveland, OH (A.B.).

3. Department of Radiology (G.J.M.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

Abstract

Background: Noninvasive electrocardiographic imaging (ECGi) is used clinically to map arrhythmias before ablation. Despite its clinical use, validation data regarding the accuracy of the system for the identification of arrhythmia foci is limited. Methods: Nine pigs underwent closed-chest placement of endocardial fiducial markers, computed tomography, and pacing in all cardiac chambers with ECGi acquisition. Pacing location was reconstructed from biplane fluoroscopy and registered to the computed tomography using the fiducials. A blinded investigator predicted the pacing location from the ECGi data, and the distance to the true pacing catheter tip location was calculated. Results: A total of 109 endocardial and 9 epicardial locations were paced in 9 pigs. ECGi predicted the correct chamber of origin in 85% of atrial and 92% of ventricular sites. Lateral locations were predicted in the correct chamber more often than septal locations (97% versus 79%, P =0.01). Absolute distances in space between the true and predicted pacing locations were 20.7 (13.8–25.6) mm (median and [first–third] quartile). Distances were not significantly different across cardiac chambers. Conclusions: The ECGi system is able to correctly identify the chamber of origin for focal activation in the vast majority of cases. Determination of the true site of origin is possible with sufficient accuracy with consideration of these error estimates.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3