Author:
Olasveengen Theresa M.,Mancini Mary E.,Perkins Gavin D.,Avis Suzanne,Brooks Steven,Castrén Maaret,Chung Sung Phil,Considine Julie,Couper Keith,Escalante Raffo,Hatanaka Tetsuo,Hung Kevin K.C.,Kudenchuk Peter,Lim Swee Han,Nishiyama Chika,Ristagno Giuseppe,Semeraro Federico,Smith Christopher M.,Smyth Michael A.,Vaillancourt Christian,Nolan Jerry P.,Hazinski Mary Fran,Morley Peter T.,Svavarsdóttir Hildigunnur,Raffay Violetta,Kuzovlev Artem,Grasner Jan-Thorsten,Dee Ryan,Smith Michael,Rajendran Kausala
Abstract
This2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation(CPR)and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendationson basic life support summarizes evidence evaluations performed for 22 topics that were prioritized by the Basic Life Support Task Force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. The evidence reviews include 16 systematic reviews, 5 scoping reviews, and 1 evidence update. Per agreement within the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation, new or revised treatment recommendations were only made after a systematic review.Systematic reviews were performed for the following topics: dispatch diagnosis of cardiac arrest, use of a firm surface for CPR, sequence for starting CPR (compressions-airway-breaths versus airway-breaths-compressions), CPR before calling for help, duration of CPR cycles, hand position during compressions, rhythm check timing, feedback for CPR quality, alternative techniques, public access automated external defibrillator programs, analysis of rhythm during chest compressions, CPR before defibrillation, removal of foreign-body airway obstruction, resuscitation care for suspected opioid-associated emergencies, drowning, and harm from CPR to victims not in cardiac arrest.The topics that resulted in the most extensive task force discussions included CPR during transport, CPR before calling for help, resuscitation care for suspected opioid-associated emergencies, feedback for CPR quality, and analysis of rhythm during chest compressions. After discussion of the scoping reviews and the evidence update, the task force prioritized several topics for new systematic reviews.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Subject
Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine