Effect of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation on Morbidity and Mortality

Author:

Chang Chia-Hsuin1,Lin Jou-Wei1,Chiu Fu-Chun1,Caffrey James L.1,Wu Li-Chiu1,Lai Mei-Shu1

Affiliation:

1. From the Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan (C-H.C., L.-C.W., M.-S.L.); Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (C.-H.C.); Cardiovascular Center (J.-W.L., F.-C.C.), National Taiwan University Hospital, Yun-Lin Branch, Dou-Liou City, Yun-Lin County, Taiwan; Department of Integrative Physiology and Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth (J.L.C....

Abstract

Background— This study examined the effect of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFA) on reducing morbidity and mortality among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods and Results— A retrospective cohort of patients with AF without prior stroke or heart failure (HF) who underwent RFA between 2003 and 2009 was identified using Taiwan’s National Health Insurance claims database. Outpatients with AF who met the same enrollment criteria but did not receive RFA were matched (≤1:20) by hospitals and dates to serve as controls. Outcomes of interest were death, stroke, or hospitalization for HF. A proportional hazard Cox regression model adjusted by propensity scores (based on age, sex, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, comorbidities, medications, and medical resource utilization) was applied to estimate the hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval. A total of 846 patients with AF who received RFA and 11 324 matched AF controls were included, with a mean follow-up of 3.74 and 3.96 years, respectively. RFA was associated with a lower hazard for stroke (hazard ratio, 0.57; 95% confidence interval, 0.35–0.94; P =0.026). The reduction in the hazard for death and HF did not reach statistical significance (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.62–1.23; P =0.451 and hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.55–1.12; P =0.185, respectively). Additional analysis using death as a competing risk showed similar results for stroke and HF. Conclusions— RFA did not reduce mortality or hospitalization for HF during the immediate 3.5-year follow-up. Although a beneficial effect on stroke prevention associated with RFA was suggested, residual confounding attributable to unmeasured factors remains a concern.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3