Biventricular Pacing Decreases Sympathetic Activity Compared With Right Ventricular Pacing in Patients With Depressed Ejection Fraction

Author:

Hamdan Mohamed H.1,Zagrodzky Jason D.1,Joglar Jose A.1,Sheehan Clifford J.1,Ramaswamy Karthik1,Erdner Jeffrey F.1,Page Richard L.1,Smith Michael L.1

Affiliation:

1. From the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and Dallas Veterans Affairs Medical Center (M.H.H., J.D.Z., J.A.J., C.J.S., K.R., R.L.P.), Dallas, Tex, and Department of Integrative Physiology (J.F.E., M.L.S.), University of North Texas Health Science Center at Fort Worth.

Abstract

Background —Although there have been few studies in which the hemodynamic effects of right ventricular (RV) and left ventricular (LV) pacing were compared with those of biventricular (BV) pacing, the autonomic changes during these different pacing modes remain unknown. We hypothesized that BV pacing results in improved hemodynamics and a decrease in sympathetic nerve activity (SNA) compared with single-site pacing. Methods and Results —Thirteen men with a mean ejection fraction of 0.28±0.7 were enrolled in the study. Arterial blood pressure (BP), central venous pressure (CVP), and SNA were recorded during 3 minutes of right atrial (RA)-RV, RA-LV, and RA-BV pacing at a rate 10 beats faster than sinus rhythm. BP was greater during LV (151±7/85±3 mm Hg) and BV (151±6/85±3 mm Hg) pacing than during RV pacing (146±7/82±3 mm Hg) ( P <0.05). There were no differences in CVP among all pacing modes ( P =0.27). SNA was significantly less ( P <0.02) during both LV (606±35 U) and BV (582±41 U) pacing compared with RV pacing (685±32 U) ( P <0.02). Although not statistically significant ( P =0.08 to 0.14), there was a trend for patients with a narrow QRS to have a lower mean BP and higher SNA during LV pacing than during BV pacing ( r =0.42 to 0.49). Conclusions —LV-based pacing results in improved hemodynamics and a decrease in SNA compared with RV pacing in patients with LV dysfunction regardless of the QRS duration.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 126 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3