Effect of Amlodipine on the Progression of Atherosclerosis and the Occurrence of Clinical Events

Author:

Pitt Bertram1,Byington Robert P.1,Furberg Curt D.1,Hunninghake Donald B.1,Mancini G. B. John1,Miller Michael E.1,Riley Ward1,(for the PREVENT Investigators) 1

Affiliation:

1. From the University of Michigan Medical Center (B.P.); Wake Forest University School of Medicine (R.P.B., C.D.F., M.E.M., W.R.); University of Minnesota Hospital/Clinic (D.B.H.); and University of British Columbia (G.B.J.M.).

Abstract

Background —The results of angiographic studies have suggested that calcium channel–blocking agents may prevent new coronary lesion formation, the progression of minimal lesions, or both. Methods and Results —The Prospective Randomized Evaluation of the Vascular Effects of Norvasc Trial (PREVENT) was a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-masked clinical trial designed to test whether amlodipine would slow the progression of early coronary atherosclerosis in 825 patients with angiographically documented coronary artery disease. The primary outcome was the average 36-month angiographic change in mean minimal diameters of segments with a baseline diameter stenosis of 30%. A secondary hypothesis was whether amlodipine would reduce the rate of atherosclerosis in the carotid arteries as assessed with B-mode ultrasonography, which measured intimal-medial thicknesses (IMT). The rates of clinical events were also monitored. The placebo and amlodipine groups had nearly identical average 36-month reductions in the minimal diameter: 0.084 versus 0.095 mm, respectively ( P =0.38). In contrast, amlodipine had a significant effect in slowing the 36-month progression of carotid artery atherosclerosis: the placebo group experienced a 0.033-mm increase in IMT, whereas there was a 0.0126-mm decrease in the amlodipine group ( P =0.007). There was no treatment difference in the rates of all-cause mortality or major cardiovascular events, although amlodipine use was associated with fewer cases of unstable angina and coronary revascularization. Conclusions —Amlodipine has no demonstrable effect on angiographic progression of coronary atherosclerosis or the risk of major cardiovascular events but is associated with fewer hospitalizations for unstable angina and revascularization.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Reference26 articles.

1. Retardation of angiographic progression of coronary artery disease by nifedipine

2. Fuster V Stein B Ambrose JA et al. Atherosclerotic plaque rupture and thrombosis: evolving concepts. Circulation . 1990;82(suppl II):II-47–II-59.

3. Schroeder AP Falk E. Vulnerable and dangerous coronary plaques. Atherosclerosis . 1995;118(suppl):S141–S149.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3