Ultrasound-Guided Strategy for Provisional Stenting With Focal Balloon Combination Catheter

Author:

Frey Axel W.1,Hodgson John M.1,Müller Christian1,Bestehorn Hans-Peter1,Roskamm Helmut1

Affiliation:

1. From the Department of Clinical Research, Herz-Zentrum, Bad Krozingen, Germany.

Abstract

Background —Intracoronary ultrasound (ICUS) has provided insights into vascular pathology and interventional therapy. The Strategy for ICUS-Guided PTCA and Stenting (SIPS) trial tested the hypothesis that routine ICUS guidance of coronary interventions improves outcome. Methods and Results —A single-center consecutive-patient randomized design (with 6-month angiographic and 2-year clinical follow-up) was used. Consecutive patients (no chronic total occlusions or emergency procedures) were randomized to ICUS-guided provisional stenting or standard angiographic guidance. Quantitative angiographic minimal lumen diameter (MLD), angiographic restenosis, clinically driven target lesion revascularization, and major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) were evaluated. A total of 291 procedures (356 lesions) were included. Procedure success was higher in the ICUS-guided group than the group randomized to standard guidance (94.7% versus 87.4%, respectively; P =0.033), whereas time (65.2±31.0 versus 60.5±34.0 minutes, P =0.18) and contrast use (209.3±94.1 versus 197.5±89.5 mL, P =0.23) were not significantly different. Stenting rates were similar (49.7% versus 49.5%, P =0.89). Acute gain was greater in the ICUS-guided group than in the standard guidance group (1.85±0.72 versus 1.67±0.76 mm, respectively; P =0.02). Angiographic 6-month analysis revealed no difference in MLD (1.71±0.94 versus 1.57±0.90, P =0.19) or binary restenosis rate (>50% diameter stenosis) (29% versus 35%, P =0.42). Clinical follow-up (602±307 days) showed a significant decrease in clinically driven target lesion revascularization in the ICUS group compared with the standard guidance group (17% versus 29%, respectively; P =0.02). Conclusions —Although angiographic MLD did not differ significantly after 6 months, ICUS-guided provisional stenting improved 2-year clinical results after intervention.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3