Bedside Multimarker Testing for Risk Stratification in Chest Pain Units

Author:

Newby L. Kristin1,Storrow Alan B.1,Gibler W. Brian1,Garvey J. Lee1,Tucker John F.1,Kaplan Andrew L.1,Schreiber Donald H.1,Tuttle Robert H.1,McNulty Steven E.1,Ohman E. Magnus1

Affiliation:

1. From Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC (L.K.N., A.L.K., R.H.T., S.E.M., E.M.O.); University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio (A.B.S., W.B.G.); Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC (J.L.G.); St Luke’s Medical Center, Milwaukee, Wis (J.F.T.); and Stanford University Hospital, Palo Alto, Calif (D.H.S.).

Abstract

Background —Earlier, rapid evaluation in chest pain units may make patient care more efficient. A multimarker strategy (MMS) testing for several markers of myocardial necrosis with different time-to-positivity profiles also may offer clinical advantages. Methods and Results —We prospectively compared bedside quantitative multimarker testing versus local laboratory results (LL) in 1005 patients in 6 chest pain units. Myoglobin, creatine kinase-MB, and troponin I were measured at 0, 3, 6, 9 to 12, and 16 to 24 hours after admission. Two MMS were defined: MMS-1 (all 3 markers) and MMS-2 (creatine kinase-MB and troponin I only). The primary assessment was to relate marker status with 30-day death or infarction. More patients were positive by 24 hours with MMS than with LL (MMS-1, 23.9%; MMS-2, 18.8%; LL, 8.8%; P =0.001, all comparisons), and they became positive sooner with MMS-1 (2.5 hours, P =0.023 versus LL) versus MMS-2 (2.8 hours, P =0.026 versus LL) or LL (3.4 hours). The relation between baseline MMS status and 30-day death or infarction was stronger (MMS-1: positive, 18.8% event rate versus negative, 3.0%, P =0.001; MMS-2: 21.9% versus 3.2%, P =0.001) than that for LL (13.6% versus 5.5%, P =0.038). MMS-1 discriminated 30-day death better (positive, 2.0% versus negative, 0.0%, P =0.007) than MMS-2 (positive, 1.8% versus negative, 0.2%; P =0.055) or LL (positive, 0.0% versus negative, 0.5%; P =1.000). Conclusions —Rapid multimarker analysis identifies positive patients earlier and provides better risk stratification for mortality than a local laboratory-based, single-marker approach.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 193 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3