Gaps in the Care of Pulmonary Hypertension: A Cross‐Sectional Patient Simulation Study Among Practicing Cardiologists and Pulmonologists

Author:

de Belen Enrico1ORCID,McConnell John W.2,Elwing Jean M.3,Paculdo David1ORCID,Cabaluna Ian1ORCID,Linder Jörg4ORCID,Peabody John W.156ORCID

Affiliation:

1. QURE Healthcare San Francisco CA

2. Norton Healthcare Louisville KY

3. UC Health Cincinnati OH

4. Janssen‐Cilag GmbH Neuss Germany

5. University of California San Francisco CA

6. University of California Los Angeles CA

Abstract

Background Diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension (PH) is often delayed or missed, leading to disease progression and missed treatment opportunities. In this study, we measured variation in care provided by board‐certified cardiologists and pulmonologists in simulated patients with potentially undiagnosed PH. Methods and Results In a cross‐sectional study ( https://www.clinicaltrials.gov , NCT04693793), 219 US practicing cardiologists and pulmonologists cared for simulated patients presenting with symptoms of chronic dyspnea and associated signs of potential PH. We scored the clinical quality‐of‐care decisions made in a clinical encounter against predetermined evidence‐based criteria. Overall, quality‐of‐care scores ranged from 18% to 74%, averaging 43.2%±11.5%. PH, when present, was correctly suspected 49.1% of the time. Conversely, physicians incorrectly identified PH in 53.7% of non‐PH cases. Physicians ordered 2‐dimensional echocardiography in just 64.3% of cases overall. Physicians who ordered 2‐dimensional echocardiography in the PH cases were significantly more likely to get the presumptive diagnosis (61.9% versus 30.7%; P <0.001). Ordering other diagnostic work‐up items showed similar results for ventilation/perfusion scan (81.5% versus 51.4%; P =0.005) and high‐resolution computed tomography (60.4% versus 43.2%; P =0.001). Physicians who correctly identified PH were significantly more likely to order confirmatory right heart catheterization or refer to PH center (67.3% versus 15.8%; P <0.001). Conclusions A wide range of care in the clinical practice among simulated patients presenting with possible PH was found, specifically in the evaluation and plan for definitive diagnosis of patients with PH. The delay or misdiagnosis of PH is likely attributed to a low clinical suspicion, nonspecific symptoms, and underuse of key diagnostic tests. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT04693793.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3