Final 5‐Year Report of the Randomized BIO‐RESORT Trial Comparing 3 Contemporary Drug‐Eluting Stents in All‐Comers

Author:

Ploumen Eline H.12ORCID,Pinxterhuis Tineke H.12ORCID,Buiten Rosaly A.1,Zocca Paolo1ORCID,Danse Peter W.3ORCID,Schotborgh Carl E.4ORCID,Scholte Martijn5ORCID,Gin R. Melvyn Tjon Joe3ORCID,Somi Samer4ORCID,van Houwelingen K. Gert1ORCID,Stoel Martin G.1,de Man H. A. F.1,Hartmann Marc1,Linssen Gerard C. M.6ORCID,van der Heijden Liefke C.1ORCID,Kok Marlies M.1ORCID,Doggen Carine J. M.2ORCID,von Birgelen Clemens12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiology Thoraxcentrum Twente, Medisch Spectrum Twente Enschede The Netherlands

2. Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Faculty BMS Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente Enschede The Netherlands

3. Department of Cardiology Rijnstate Hospital Arnhem The Netherlands

4. Department of Cardiology Haga Hospital The Hague The Netherlands

5. Department of Cardiology Albert Schweitzer Hospital Dordrecht The Netherlands

6. Department of Cardiology Hospital Group Twente Almelo, Hengelo The Netherlands

Abstract

Background In a previous trial, higher 5‐year mortality was observed following treatment with biodegradable polymer Orsiro sirolimus‐eluting stents (SES). We assessed 5‐year safety and efficacy of all‐comers as well as patients with diabetes treated with SES or Synergy everolimus‐eluting stents (EES) versus durable polymer Resolute Integrity zotarolimus‐eluting stents (ZES). Methods and Results The randomized BIO‐RESORT (Comparison of Biodegradable Polymer and Durable Polymer Drug‐Eluting Stents in an All Comers Population) trial enrolled 3514 all‐comer patients at 4 Dutch cardiac centers. Patients aged ≥18 years who required percutaneous coronary intervention were eligible. Participants were stratified for diabetes and randomized to treatment with SES, EES, or ZES (1:1:1). The main end point was target vessel failure (cardiac mortality, target vessel myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization). Five‐year follow‐up was available in 3183 of 3514 (90.6%) patients. The main end point target vessel failure occurred in 142 of 1169 (12.7%) patients treated with SES, 130 of 1172 (11.6%) treated with EES, versus 157 of 1173 (14.1%) treated with ZES (hazard ratio [HR], 0.89 [95% CI, 0.71–1.12], P log‐rank =0.31; and HR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.65–1.04], P log‐rank =0.10, respectively). Individual components of target vessel failure showed no significant between‐stent difference. Very late definite stent thrombosis rates were low and similar (SES, 1.1%; EES, 0.6%; ZES, 0.9%). In patients with diabetes, target vessel failure did not differ significantly between stent‐groups (SES, 19.8%; EES, 19.2%; versus ZES, 21.1% [ P log‐rank =0.69 and P log‐rank =0.63]). Conclusions Orsiro SES, Synergy EES, and Resolute Integrity ZES showed similar 5‐year outcomes of safety and efficacy, including mortality. A prespecified stent comparison in patients with diabetes also revealed no significant differences in 5‐year clinical outcomes. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT01674803.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3