Internet Versus Noninternet Participation in a Decentralized Clinical Trial: Lessons From the ADAPTABLE Study

Author:

Shen Rebecca1ORCID,Mulder Hillary2ORCID,Wruck Lisa2ORCID,Weissler E. Hope3ORCID,Robertson Holly R.2,Sharlow Amber G.2ORCID,Kripalani Sunil4ORCID,Muñoz Daniel4,Effron Mark B.5ORCID,Gupta Kamal6ORCID,Girotra Saket7ORCID,Whittle Jeff8ORCID,Benziger Catherine P.9ORCID,VanWormer Jeffrey J.10ORCID,Polonsky Tamar S.11ORCID,Rothman Russell L.4ORCID,Harrington Robert A.12ORCID,Hernandez Adrian F.2ORCID,Jones W. Schuyler213ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Duke University School of Medicine Durham NC USA

2. Duke Clinical Research Institute Durham NC USA

3. Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Duke University School of Medicine Durham NC USA

4. Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville TN USA

5. University of Queensland‐Ochsner Clinical School New Orleans LA USA

6. University of Kansas Medical Center Kansas City KA USA

7. University of Iowa Iowa City IA USA

8. Medical College of Wisconsin Milwaukee WI USA

9. Essentia Health Heart and Vascular Center Duluth MN USA

10. Marshfield Clinic Research Institute Marshfield WI USA

11. University of Chicago Medicine Chicago IL USA

12. Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford CA USA

13. Division of Cardiology Duke University Health System Durham NC USA

Abstract

Background Internet‐based participation has the potential to enhance pragmatic and decentralized trials, where representative study populations and generalizability to clinical practice are key. We aimed to study the differences between internet and noninternet/telephone participants in a large remote, pragmatic trial. Methods and Results In a subanalysis of the ADAPTABLE (Aspirin Dosing: A Patient‐Centric Trial Assessing Benefits and Long‐Term Effectiveness) study, we compared internet participants with those who opted for noninternet participation. Study process measures examined included participant characteristics at consent, study medication adherence, and study retention. The clinical outcome examined was a composite of all‐cause mortality, hospitalization for myocardial infarction, or hospitalization for stroke. Noninternet participants were older (mean 69.4 versus 67.4 years), more likely to be female (38.9% versus 30.2%), more likely to be Black (27.3% versus 6.0%) or Hispanic (11.1% versus 2.0%), and had a higher number of comorbid conditions. The composite clinical outcome was more than twice as high in noninternet participants. The hazard of nonadherence to the assigned aspirin dosage was 46% higher in noninternet participants than internet participants. Conclusions Noninternet participants differed from internet participants in notable demographic characteristics while having poorer baseline health. Over the course of ADAPTABLE, they also had worse clinical outcomes and greater likelihood of study drug nonadherence. These results suggest that trials focused on internet participation select for younger, healthier participants with a higher proportion of traditionally overrepresented patients. Allowing noninternet participation enhances diversity; however, additional steps may be needed to promote study retention and study medication adherence. Registration Information clinicaltrials.gov . Identifier: NCT02697916.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3