Procedural Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Focal and Diffuse Coronary Artery Disease

Author:

Mizukami Takuya12ORCID,Sonck Jeroen1ORCID,Sakai Koshiro13,Ko Brian4,Maeng Michael5ORCID,Otake Hiromasa6,Koo Bon‐Kwon7ORCID,Nagumo Sakura18,Nørgaard Bjarne L.5,Leipsic Jonathon9,Shinke Toshiro3ORCID,Munhoz Daniel11011,Mileva Niya112ORCID,Belmonte Marta113,Ohashi Hirofumi114,Barbato Emanuele111ORCID,Johnson Nils P.15ORCID,De Bruyne Bernard116ORCID,Collet Carlos1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Cardiovascular Center Aalst OLV Clinic Aalst Belgium

2. Department of Clinical Pharmacology Showa University Tokyo Japan

3. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine Showa University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan

4. Monash Cardiovascular Research Centre Monash University and Monash Heart, Monash Health Clayton Victoria Australia

5. Department of Cardiology Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark

6. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine Kobe Japan

7. Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular Center Seoul National University Hospital Seoul Korea

8. Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital Yokohama Japan

9. Department of Medicine and Radiology University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia Canada

10. Department of Internal Medicine, Discipline of Cardiology University of Campinas (Unicamp) Campinas Brazil

11. Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences University of Naples, Federico II Naples Italy

12. Cardiology Clinic Alexandrovska University Hospital Sofia Bulgaria

13. Department of Cardiology University of Milan Milan Italy

14. Department of Cardiology Aichi Medical University Nagakute Japan

15. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Weatherhead PET Center McGovern Medical School at UTHealth and Memorial Hermann Hospital Houston TX

16. Department of Cardiology Lausanne University Center Hospital Lausanne Switzerland

Abstract

Background Coronary artery disease (CAD) patterns play an essential role in the decision‐making process about revascularization. The pullback pressure gradient (PPG) quantifies CAD patterns as either focal or diffuse based on fractional flow reserve (FFR) pullbacks. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of CAD patterns on acute percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) results considered surrogates of clinical outcomes. Methods and Results This was a prospective, multicenter study of patients with hemodynamically significant CAD undergoing PCI. Motorized FFR pullbacks and optical coherence tomography (OCT) were performed before and after PCI. Post‐PCI FFR >0.90 was considered an optimal result. Focal disease was defined as PPG >0.73 (highest PPG tertile). Overall, 113 patients (116 vessels) were included. Patients with focal disease were younger than those with diffuse CAD (61.4±9.9 versus 65.1±8.7 years, P =0.042). PCI in vessels with high PPG (focal CAD) resulted in higher post‐PCI FFR (0.91±0.07 in the focal group versus 0.86±0.05 in the diffuse group, P <0.001) and larger minimal stent area (6.3±2.3 mm 2 in focal versus 5.3±1.8 mm 2 in diffuse CAD, P =0.015) compared withvessels with low PPG (diffuse CAD). The PPG was associated with the change in FFR after PCI ( R 2 =0.51, P <0.001). The PPG significantly improved the capacity to predict optimal PCI results compared with an angiographic assessment of CAD patterns (area under the curve PPG 0.81 [95% CI, 0.73–0.88] versus area under the curve angio 0.51 [95% CI, 0.42–0.60]; P <0.001). Conclusions PCI in vessels with focal disease defined by the PPG resulted in greater improvement in epicardial conductance and larger minimal stent area compared with diffuse disease. PPG, but not angiographically defined CAD patterns, distinguished patients attaining superior procedural outcomes. Registration URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03782688

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3