Initial Antihypertensive Regimens in Newly Treated Patients: Real World Evidence From the OneFlorida+ Clinical Research Network

Author:

Smith Steven M.123ORCID,Winterstein Almut G.1ORCID,Gurka Matthew J.4ORCID,Walsh Marta G.1ORCID,Keshwani Shailina1ORCID,Libby Anne M.5ORCID,Hogan William R.1ORCID,Pepine Carl J.2ORCID,Cooper‐DeHoff Rhonda M.236ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy University of Florida Gainesville FL

2. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine University of Florida Gainesville FL

3. Center for Integrative Cardiovascular and Metabolic Disease University of Florida Gainesville FL

4. Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine University of Florida Gainesville FL

5. Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine University of Colorado Denver Aurora CO

6. Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research, College of Pharmacy University of Florida Gainesville FL

Abstract

Background Knowledge of real‐world antihypertensive use is limited to prevalent hypertension, limiting our understanding of how treatment evolves and its contribution to persistently poor blood pressure control. We sought to characterize antihypertensive initiation among new users. Methods and Results Using Medicaid and Medicare data from the OneFlorida+ Clinical Research Consortium, we identified new users of ≥1 first‐line antihypertensives (angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor, calcium channel blocker, angiotensin receptor blocker, thiazide diuretic, or β‐blocker) between 2013 and 2021 among adults with diagnosed hypertension, and no antihypertensive fill during the prior 12 months. We evaluated initial antihypertensive regimens by class and drug overall and across study years and examined variation in antihypertensive initiation across demographics (sex, race, and ethnicity) and comorbidity (chronic kidney disease, diabetes, and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease). We identified 143 054 patients initiating 188 995 antihypertensives (75% monotherapy; 25% combination therapy), with mean age 59 years and 57% of whom were women. The most commonly initiated antihypertensive class overall was angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors (39%) followed by β‐blockers (31%), calcium channel blockers (24%), thiazides (19%), and angiotensin receptor blockers (11%). With the exception of β‐blockers, a single drug accounted for ≥75% of use of each class. β‐blocker use decreased (35%–26%), and calcium channel blocker use increased (24%–28%) over the study period, while initiation of most other classes remained relatively stable. We also observed significant differences in antihypertensive selection across demographic and comorbidity strata. Conclusions These findings indicate that substantial variation exists in initial antihypertensive prescribing, and there remain significant gaps between current guideline recommendations and real‐world implementation in early hypertension care.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3